this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
297 points (80.6% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7603 readers
889 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The hard fact is that what the population votes for is what the population gets. They have completely given up their agency and just accept this impotent logic of "we'll take whatever the most obvious/most apparently easy option is, that isn't a Republican". It's a cyclical problem, the voters don't care enough to force politicians to be good, and the politicians don't care enough to court voters.
At the same time, "what the population votes for is what the population gets" ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say "you get what you fight for, and if you don't fight you get what you get."
I... haven't really fought for anything. I believed the right things. I voted as best I could. But that clearly didn't stop this.
I want to protect my ego and say I'm not a coward. Is there a distinction to be made between cowardice and simply not knowing what to do? I don't know. I just know I'm trying my best, but maybe that's just not enough.
It does not ignore that, rather it explicitly takes that into account.
The caveat to my statement would ONLY be "so long as we're using this system."
Please focus more on accurate logic.