LibreWolf

3423 readers

284 users here now

Welcome to the official community for LibreWolf.

LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. If you have any question please visit our FAQ first: https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/

To learn more or to download the browser visit the website: https://librewolf.net/

If you want to contribute head over to our Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/librewolf

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

fishonthenet@lemmy.ml

-5

LibreWolf's defaults are too strict and slow down adoption (jlai.lu)

submitted 23 hours ago by azalty@jlai.lu to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I believe LibreWolf's defaults are too strict and slow down adoption. Most options are either : all or nothing. No in-between.

Sadly, I believe the default settings are too strict and will slow down adoption by the mass, which would in term bring a better anonymity set.

It's not a great alternative to Firefox because LibreWolf is just not usable for the daily user: no DRM, no cookies, no history, websites that break... The browser should let the user choose:

Maximum compatibility (more tracking)
Mid-option (like a modded firefox but without the annoyances like cookies not being stored, having a fixed size, or forced light-mode/timezone)
Best privacy (pretty much the current mode)

I find myself forced to edit the default settings which is a huge privacy/fingerprinting risk. If we create 'settings groups', yes, the privacy will be hurt, but at least we will be more in each group.

What do you think about this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] M1ch431@lemmy.ml 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

LibreWolf works fine for me with the defaults on many websites. If I want to browse a website that uses DRM or has other privacy-hostile mitigations, I can use another browser. It's not like I'm locked down to one option.

And I'm pretty sure LibreWolf does save history. As for cookies, you can keep them fairly easily. This is all in the options panel, which is very minimal and compact just like Firefox.

I do like your suggestion of settings groups even if it does increase the fingerprinting surface potentially, but I'm afraid the LibreWolf team is already struggling to keep pace. I'm sure if an issue/pull request was started they would consider implementing this.

Perhaps for fingerprinting purposes, you could even have site-specific configurations for everything besides DRM, but I'm unsure if that would be easy to implement.