this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
-5 points (38.1% liked)

LibreWolf

3365 readers
164 users here now

Welcome to the official community for LibreWolf.

LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. If you have any question please visit our FAQ first: https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/

To learn more or to download the browser visit the website: https://librewolf.net/

If you want to contribute head over to our Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/librewolf

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I believe LibreWolf's defaults are too strict and slow down adoption. Most options are either : all or nothing. No in-between.

Sadly, I believe the default settings are too strict and will slow down adoption by the mass, which would in term bring a better anonymity set.

It's not a great alternative to Firefox because LibreWolf is just not usable for the daily user: no DRM, no cookies, no history, websites that break... The browser should let the user choose:

  • Maximum compatibility (more tracking)
  • Mid-option (like a modded firefox but without the annoyances like cookies not being stored, having a fixed size, or forced light-mode/timezone)
  • Best privacy (pretty much the current mode)

I find myself forced to edit the default settings which is a huge privacy/fingerprinting risk. If we create 'settings groups', yes, the privacy will be hurt, but at least we will be more in each group.

What do you think about this?

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's specifically forked to be the most privacy respecting non-Tor browser out there. The extreme privacy is the point of it. I'm not sure what it is you want but its not LW - and thats fine, use another fork instead.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago

Not to recommend as I don't use them (I use LW and Mullvad - and Ironfox on mobile - all of which might give you the same issues you have with LW) but I've heard people mention Mercury, Floorp and Waterfox as being good privacy focused alternatives.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I think you're missing the point of this browser. This is not a browser designed for masses.

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Librewolf's defaults are sane. Masses don't care about privacy anyway, they just use Chrome.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 7 hours ago

I care about privacy but think librewolf's default are too strict. I know other people that would think the same.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: LibreWolf's defaults are one of its main selling points.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Then it'll never truly rise, if it's for really a really small niche

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago

Yep. It doesn’t even have auto updates so unless you actively use a package manager, people are likely going to miss security updates anyway.

I don’t think it’s meant to be a mass adoption browser. It fills a niche and it fills it pretty well.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not everything is meant to. It was made for a specific purpose and works for that purpose.

It seems to be doing just fine to me.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Just like Lemmy. Not for everyone but good enough for us.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t care about adoption line go up, and I agree with Mozilla’s founder that adding DRM to Firefox was Mozilla’s original sin.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

At the end of the day, I just want a better for privacy browser than Firefox and Brave, without having to fight with it so it works the way I want it to

The defaults and strict options just makes me feel like it's not a user-friendly browser. It doesn't let me have the browser I want to use, but rather someone else's vision of the browser

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago

Yes, it is someone else’s vision of a browser, and evidently wasn’t made for users like you. As the saying goes, what do you want for nothing, your money back?

[–] Puschel_das_Eichhorn@lemm.ee 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You know... Firefox is also still there.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I know, but it has tracking and data collection by default. Having a Firefox fork without that by default could be good

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Does it really?

So far all the freakout has been due to changes to its terms of service. There's been no changes to the codebase that add any data collection.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 2 points 14 hours ago

I’m not talking about the ToS thing. Firefox has been gradually collecting data, mainly telemetry, in a pseudo anonymous way or saying they are fully anonymous, but without providing any way to disable it easily. The provided opt-out check doesn’t remove all the telemetry checks, like the different pings being sent occasionally, telling them which version of Firefox you're using for their analytics and usage stats.

The more Firefox grows, the more data they collect. It’s been like that for quite some time. Mozilla is a fake non-profit, higher-ups get paid a shit ton, and almost all their income comes from Google being the default search engine.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I don't think privacy related browsers will ever really become mainstream. The closest we have is probably Brave, and more people honestly use that because of hype and adblocking still working post manifest v3 on it while still being chromium based.

I'm honestly very happy with Librewolf, but then again I default to browsing the web with JS turned off, so I'm definitely not anyone's target audience.

[–] M1ch431@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

LibreWolf works fine for me with the defaults on many websites. If I want to browse a website that uses DRM or has other privacy-hostile mitigations, I can use another browser. It's not like I'm locked down to one option.

And I'm pretty sure LibreWolf does save history. As for cookies, you can keep them fairly easily. This is all in the options panel, which is very minimal and compact just like Firefox.

I do like your suggestion of settings groups even if it does increase the fingerprinting surface potentially, but I'm afraid the LibreWolf team is already struggling to keep pace. I'm sure if an issue/pull request was started they would consider implementing this.

Perhaps for fingerprinting purposes, you could even have site-specific configurations for everything besides DRM, but I'm unsure if that would be easy to implement.

[–] SomGye@dormi.zone 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's why I use Waterfox as my main browser and LibreWolf as my secondary for quick searches and things I want to be separated.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Seems nice, but them using Bing and getting paid for it is... a bit counter intuitive... no tracking, except if it gives us a bit of money

A bit like firefox... oh well

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Why don’t you create the exact browser you want, publish it, and then listen to people like you complain that it’s not the exact browser they want? 😂 Seriously, it takes like a few seconds to tweak the user settings w/r/t search engines.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu -1 points 14 hours ago

Off-topic. I’m just saying I have trust issues on the proposed fork because of the deal they have with Microsoft, which I think is more than valid.

I’d like to have a browser I can feel comfortable using and also feel comfortable recommending it to less tech people. Sadly right now there’s no perfect option. We should always aim for the ideal tool, don’t you think?

And seriously, you’re using the « do it yourself if you’re not happy »? Nice way to stop a discussion without any arguments. Do better.

[–] SomGye@dormi.zone 4 points 16 hours ago

Yeah I removed that immediately. Most browsers and forks make their money through search engine partnerships, sadly.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

You can change the default search engine in less than five clicks. You're going to be installing the addons you need anyway (uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger at bare minimum).