Canada

The majority of UN countries are on their side, Muslim majority countries included.

And claiming "U.N. body rejects debate on China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims in blow to West" means a majority of countries on their side is just dishonest. China has a massive economy and is able to put political pressure on plenty of nations in the UN.

This would be like saying America has never pressured another nation into voting for something in the UN.

linking wikipedia is providing an enormous list of sources and summaries

at this point, the uighur issue is the bullshit asymmetry principal: it’s been proven time and time again and anyone asking for “sources” isn’t arguing in good faith: they’re relying on the fact that asking for sources takes thousands of times less energy than countering

so that’s what you get: a massive list of pre-prepared sources

*edit: and if you’d have actually read the article you posted, the UNHRC didn’t vote against the motion because they thought there was nothing to investigate: they voted against it to “avoid alienating china”

What they were doing was textbook sealioning. This information is right there for anyone to find and has been for years.

If China is authoritarian and censors all information that makes China look bad, and spreads propaganda to other countries that those Governments are spreading propaganda to make China look bad and China isn't actually bad, does it matter what is motivating the US to say "China Bad" when they objectively are?

I would be sympathetic if the Uyghur stuff was true.

This is denial, plain and simple.

It is not everyone else's job to provide this ignoramus sources on the facts of the matter when we are all communicating on the internet where those facts can be found. Especially when no source can possibly be good enough when "they haven't seen anything convincing yet" even though everyone but China and their allies are saying the same damn thing, including people who have fled China, and they are only referencing US sources.

Let's use some simple logic here, bub.

Why would organisations who aren’t scared to criticise the west and have a really good track record like anmety intl and HRW make the suffering of the Uyghur people up?

It’s really fucking hard for me to understand why many people have so much trouble accepting both China/Russia and the West are heavily unethical. There’s no magic place that does everything ethically, and I don’t know why we’re refusing to acknowledge the cultural genocide of a large population, leading to extreme suffering for hunderds of thousands, because it criticises one country. It doesn’t matter who did it, it absolutely is awful, and we shouldn’t be denying it. Denying it only compounds the extreme suffering the population faces.