-2
Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old)
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I'm going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.
T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can't speak for another person's intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.
I'm trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?
I don't know much about shipping (ie, fan fiction content that is usually focused on new sexual/romantic relationships between characters) but no, shipping without pedophilia is not equivalent to shipping with pedophilia - not in terms of it's 'potential for scandal,' criminality, or ethics.
I think your judgement to call out that person's pedophilia (that involves a minor IRL) was sound. Their minimization of their behaviour does not surprise me. One barometer I use for this is lemmynsfw.com's moderation policies. Underage AI content (and any kind of underage content) is forbidden. Protecting children from sexual abuse is a hard line in society, as it should be; and it's everyone's job to offer protection however they can