343
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] arrow74@lemm.ee 133 points 2 years ago

Once this administration defies the courts democracy will be over in the US.

It won't be a one off either, he will then begin doing whatever he wants. Congress will not stop him.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 94 points 2 years ago

They already have multiple times now, no?

[-] arrow74@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago

They've broken the law blatantly and have not reversed some things that they should have, but typically they have stopped doing the action when the courts have ordered it.

So they have sorta, but not outright

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 years ago

They were literally told to hold on deporting these people, and then said nope we got them in the air already, in under 24 hours. If that's not outright defying the court, I don't know what else we're waiting for.

[-] arrow74@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

If they arrest more people after the court order. That will tell us for sure.

I'm not saying things are good right now, they're pretty bleak

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It isn't the first time they've rushed deportations to stay ahead of court orders. All you have to do is skip that pesky woke "due process" nonsense. Thats the new SOP.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 22 points 2 years ago

President Donald Trump's administration made a calculated decision to ignore a judge's directive to turn around two flights containing hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members, sources familiar with the matter told ABC News.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-admin-ignores-judges-order-bring-deportation-planes/story?id=119857181

[-] arrow74@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

At least they're still working under pretense and condition. They "can't" turn them around because they're already in route.

It's not good, but they are using a contrived reason. I'm afraid for the day they stop trying to justify it and keep doing it.

Things are getting to that point rapidly

[-] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

And as we all know, planes can't turn around. Too bad those Wright brothers couldn't figure that little maneuver out. And it's made air combat in wars very complicated and pointless since planes can't just turn around and get back to where they took off from.

/s

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I believe most of those were based on intentionally misreading of the orders from my understanding. The recent one with sending people to El Salvador was more much blatant. Especially as people within the whitehouse are blatantly poking at the judge. For instance, yhey are retweeting the el salvador president "joking" and saying "Oppsie, too late" (they were ordered to turn the planes around before they got there)

It's going to matter what the courts do from here out. They have the power to sanctuation. If Marshalls don't enforce said sanctions, they have the power to deputize others to enforce for them if the courts are willing to do so

if the courts are willing to do so

That's a big "if."

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Isn't this an example of that, right here, right now?

[-] arrow74@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

There are words and there are actions, but we're not far off

[-] ugtug@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

This is solid defeatist bullshit. Trump can't put everyone in prison. If Trump won't back down, the people will step up. The protests are just getting started.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

When the option with the most 'votes' was to abstain from voting, is it still a democracy?

this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
343 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31727 readers
4359 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS