this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
206 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
52 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
206
People who think Lemmy is too political and refuse to join is good. (beehaw.org)
submitted 2 years ago by queue@beehaw.org to c/chat@beehaw.org
290 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://old.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/140vbey/launching_rlemmymigration_what_communities_have/jmxnzsh/?context=1

Look at here and the people who complain about it being too hard to figure out are the ones complaining about "I can't use muh slurs, this is awful."

"The left of today is very much in favour of censorship to avoid “harm.” This makes those of us in the middle very wary of signing up to any partisan media." /u/decidedlysticky23

/u/misshapensteed claims he isn't far right, but explictly only posts on PoliticalCompassMemes and TheLeftCantMeme and KotakuInAction.

If they are too stupid to figure out we know they're lying, they're too stupid to figure out lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] animist@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Minor correction, socialism has one definition and one definition only: worker ownership of the means of production

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I support that definition, but it's false, unconstructive and arrogant to declare it's the only one. It never has been. It's not even Marx's definition, which is undoubtedly an extremely influential one throughout history. This is the kind of dogmatism I'd expect from a tankie.

Socialism is a widespread global phenomenon with hundreds of variants and competing theories from a range of historical underpinnings. There never has been one definition, not even back in the 1800s.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Eh, agree to disagree