768
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 103 points 1 year ago

Imagine spending $250m dollars to get deported. It would be awesome if he was sent back to South Africa.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

That's a funny way to spell El Salvador.

The rules don't apply to the ultra rich. Even the horrifying rules.

Unfortunately.

[-] 0li0li@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

TBF, proportionally speaking, it's like me spending $20. I would not expect this amount to make a difference if it were me.

250M is nothing to this prick.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It is very expensive for their pride.

Those billionaires don't actually have the money ready in cash, just a tiny part of that is liquid, everything is in stocks. They are getting paid in stocks from their company. Why? Because until you're selling the stocks, for the government you don't have a revenue to tax. Suppose this year you get a salary of $100 billion in stocks. If you convert in cash only $100k, then the tax owed that year is minuscule. Those assholes have teams dedicated to minimize the amount of taxes owed. It is why he didn't use his money to buy xitter but used his stock and "genius CEO" fame as a collateral to persuade banks and other arab investors to lend the money for him (and hold the bag if it sank)

So in order to donate that quarter of a billion he had to liquidate stocks and pay taxes on that. Ouch, so so much painful for a billionaire. For them paying taxes is like being robbed. So, it's more like paying $20k for you

[-] 0li0li@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

While you are correct with all that, I would argue it's not like paying half of all I have. Say your 20k is after 33% tax, that'd be 30k before taxes, our of the 50k I did my original math with.

It's be like paying 30$ then, plus the "I'm rich and greedy so it hurts", say 1k of physocological damage... Still a very small portion of what I have.

Hell, just in insurance, I'm paying way more than that every year!

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He's Canadian through his mother.

We'd just get stuck with him.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

He won't be. Too rich and powerful.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think there's a very low but not zero chance because it really feels like Trump is trying to make Putin's Russia here in the US. When the rich and powerful men start talking shit in Russia, they very quickly end up being not so rich and powerful.

[-] tartarin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

He already said Canada isn't a real country. They have to send him in a real country. They can't deport him in Canada and make Canada the 51st State and start over again.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Where’s that petition to revoke his citizenship at, anyway? Would be a nice elbow to the head.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago

Imagine spending $250m dollars to get deported.

As others have said: $43 billion. Elon bought Twitter.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but he was forced to complete that transaction after he changed his mind.

[-] psoul@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What about he gets half his money back and goes exactly half the way to South Africa?

[-] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Elon is a brilliant businessman. When he was only 12, he started his first business as a bridge troll. Now at…whatever he is, he’s being kicked out of a country he literally bought.

[-] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

South Africa doesn’t want him.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
768 points (98.6% liked)

politics

31376 readers
2346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS