248
submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Thousands and thousands of people line up every day to wait in long, slow moving lines just to get to the barrier around the Mona Lisa to photograph it.

The Mona Lisa might be the most reproduced image in all of history. And the people who get the opportunity to see it in person can only think to photograph it one more time.

It's almost if that were the point. Taking a selfie with Lisa is the correct way to experience this art. If your camera broke, there is no reason to wait on line just to what, see the painting?

[-] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My experience visiting the Mona Lisa was being disappointed how small it was hanging on the wall, looking even smaller surrounded by all the protective glass, and then even smaller because of how far back the crowd has to stand.

That was a split second thought, interrupted by being aggressively pushed forward so that people behind me could get a better look with their cameras, while I'm pushing back, trying not to trample a tiny kid standing in front of me. Easily the worst part of my visit to France was seeing the Mona Lisa.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

See, I came prepared. I actually knew what the Mona Lisa looked like already

And so when I came to see the Mona Lisa, I came to see the madness surrounding a tiny, kind of mid painting

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

It's also one of the most disappointing tourist attractions, with the most common complaint is that it's smaller than most visitors imagined. It's like waiting in line to summit Everest. The experience is not as rewarding as knowing you've done it.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

When I went to the Louvre and saw the Mona Lisa, I was in a big crowd huddled around it behind stanchions with two guards on either side. It's a cool painting, and it's cool to say I saw it in person I guess, but the museum itself is fucking HUGE. I don't think I even saw all of it that one day, and we were there for a few hours.

I took a picture of it through another guy's phone in front of me. He was about to take a picture, as he held up his phone for a good angle, and I snapped it as it was on his screen.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Now that's art.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I heard somewhere that it would take a person 6-8 months to watch every exhibit in The Louvre.

[-] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Pro tip, seek out the “Spanish Mona Lisa” which was produced by the same art team as the real Mona Lisa as one of its pro or trial pieces and you can get right up to it, nearly. Saw it at an expo in Shanghai and the family loved it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa_(Prado)

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It is absolutely mind boggling. So much amazing art at the Louvre and the only thing people want to see is a small picture we have all seen hundreds of time.

[-] starchylemming@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

its incredible, and you get to enjoy the awesome works on the floors leading to the fake mona lisa in peace.

all the idiots beeline to the little chamber that can be skipped altogether (you can glimpse on the mini painting and the huge crowd from the grand hallway outside)

the museum also had nintendo switch audio guides with almost working gps tracking and some audios were actually interesting. rule of thumb: if they start with french names you never heard of its not getting better.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

It's no longer about seeing the small picture we've seen hundreds of times.

It's about showing their followers and friends on social media that they were physically there to take a picture of a portrait that everyone has seen hundreds of times.

Social media is killing our species.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, I remember going to the Louvre well before Social Media and back then most people around the Mona Lisa were, just like nowadays, far more worried about taking pictures of it than actually just enjoying it.

IMHO, people always tended to be weird around famous shit and famous people.

It wasn't social media that made most people be like that. Most likely it's the reverse: social is successful because most people are like that.

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Probably a lot of overlap with the type of people that spend hundreds of dollars to see a popular band play their most popular song everyone's heard several times.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's so annoying if you AREN'T there to take a picture of it. We were in Paris last year and went to the Musee d'Orsay but didn't go to the Louvre. We like to stand and appreciate the artwork, taking in the beauty of them. It was so hard to do with any painting even remotely famous, since there were lines of people pushing to the front to take the best possible picture of it (which has already been taken by pro photographers). They weren't even looking at the painting, just their phone's screen as they took the picture then walked away. I'm just standing still looking forward, and they would shoulder me aside to get a better photo then walk away. Other paintings just as pretty? Who cares, not famous.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
248 points (97.3% liked)

News

39683 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS