1048
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I am not doubting, but I am surprised that the article does not even mention Israel. I can't see their tourism growing this year

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm equally perplexed. So tourism to places like North Korea or places in active war like Libya or South Sudan have gone up?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

During the civil war in the usa in the 1800s, locals would leave their house, bring a blanket, and a picnic basket. They would sit on top of a hill, and watch the battle, like it was entertainment.

Maybe that's making a comeback?

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I suspect it's unchanged from its already low number in those places.

[-] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago
[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, in fairness, NK would make more sense, tbh. It's been so closed off for so long, that it increasing tourism after opening to it a few years back isn't that surprising. But my point still stands regarding other countries that are extremely dangerous/even worse than the US in terms of safety.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

But if we included those countries we wouldn't be able to condemn America with our shocking but false headline.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be fair, hard to decline when it's already low. Even if they did include Israel or other countries mentioned in the replies, it's still totally possible their tourism isn't lower this year than last. Especially places where it was already pretty much 0 or statistically insignificant. Not declining doesn't mean it went up, just means it's at least the same percentage it was last year.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It's because Israel is one of the USA. It was a clarity moment.

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 year ago

The Gaza shore is lovely this time of year, would be nice to visit if not for ALL THE GENOCIDE!!!

[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Israel‘s tourism is in a pretty bad slump. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-859360

About 250,000 people in Israel work in the tourism industry, and tourism makes up 2.8% of the Israeli economy, Aronson said. She noted that 2019 was the record year for incoming tourism, with 4.6 million tourists. In 2024, there were about 1 million tourists, and 2025 will probably see about 1.3 million by the end of the year.

According to Ben Ari, one reason tourists don’t come is that they can’t get travel insurance for Israel.

People from countries that have warnings about traveling to Israel can’t get insurance, Aronson said. She added that the ministry is working with foreign governments to reduce travel warnings.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Israel has had a ceasefire for a bit. Unlike last year, when it was fighting all the time.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But I don't remember their airports being closed last year, like they have this time. Last year they were bombing the sh#t out of Gaza. This year they have had some hits themselves.

Personally, I'd have thought that Israel itself would have been a more dangerous place this year than last

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

June saw a 42% collapse due to airport closures. The probably more important number is that 2023 tourism was more then three times higher then it was this year.

[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The airports were only closed for like two weeks during the war against Iran.

That said. I know two people who have visited friends in Israel this year. Only one of them had to go a shelter.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
1048 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31115 readers
1927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS