this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
96 points (98.0% liked)

cybersecurity

6406 readers
46 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

Enjoy!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol I never knew Microsoft considers uac a convince feature not a security boundary

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, I kinda see that point. I never considered it a boundary anyway since it didn’t require any additional authentication or authorization. It always felt more like a “here be dragons” warning for people who may not know what their doing, but if you think about it your user context never changes.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It has some level of additional security I think? some remote access apps have issues with them.

[–] ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, by default windows launches UAC prompts in the supposedly isolated "secure desktop" instead of the classical "interactive user desktop".

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago

You can also up your UAC security level, so it requires your password, like most Linux distros do. This can (disregarding bypasses like this one) thwart keystroke injection attacks like that from a USB Rubber Ducky.

Then you never thought about it - at least not in relation to who was responsible for it. I mean... because who would think that but Microsoft?