this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43393 readers
48 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have mixed feeling about this.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't. This is fundamentally worse than Google owning Chrome.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Chrome inevitably losing a lot of market share could be a pretty good result for the web.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will it? Twitter is a Nazi bar, but it still has a large customer base.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And nothing of value would be lost when the nazi bar closes down

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the Nazi bar still has patrons.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And they are nazis and i dont care if they lose their place and i dont care of the owner of a nazi bar profits. Evil does not deserve a seat at the table

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago

I'm speaking in context to Sina's comment. Because a company/service becomes shitty doesn't mean that the company/service loses a lot of market share.

[–] Aquaphobi@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What’s wrong with perplexity owning chrome?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason to own a browser is to shape the Internet to your company's favor.

Internet Explorer was designed to ensure web apps would be hard to build, helping to ensure the Windows monopoly.

Chrome was designed to open the Internet, but tie it to Google search and keep Internet browsing lucrative for advertising, helping to benefit Ad Sense.

An AI startup owning Chrome is probably going to be the biggest privacy nightmare since Copilot.

[–] Aquaphobi@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the insight

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Turning the most popular browser further into an AI hellscape.

Influencing how every other browser (minus Firefox's minuscule marketshare) functions via the engine.

On the other hand, no longer under googles control.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google is doing/will be doing all this anyway, combined with a search, maps, youtube, email, etc monopoly.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I did list no longer being controlled by Google 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In order to better understand the user, their prompts, etc and to be able to fully modify websites, these AIs need access to the DOM.

This is made much more easier if you integrate your AI to a browser.

So, in theory, the AI could understand what your are currently researching, profile your interest, and provide you answers before you even made a prompt.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just imagine, a corporate hellscape inspired by Minority Report!

<buzzlightyearmeme

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

"Slaves... Slaves everywhere..."