this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
66 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34975 readers
70 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pax@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh no. I hate voice controlled tech. it's off for me. I would not use that at all.

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see any downside at all if it's layered on top of some other (very capable) keyboard-driven UI that can do all the same things.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t see any downside at all if it’s layered on top of some other (very capable) keyboard-driven UI that can do all the same things.

The downside is that no existing tech company has enough self-control to actually keep these kinds of recordings private.

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's why we need something open-source and self-hosted.

[–] drwho@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Several such solutions already exist. Problem is, only folks like us mess around with it. Non-geeks, not so much.

[–] KelsonV@wandering.shop 2 points 1 year ago

@gzrrt @pineapple Yeah - ideally, any voice control processing or recordings should never leave the device it's used on. At worst, the local network.

It's so annoying that the tech for voice recognition became usable before mobile processing power caught up but after mobile bandwidth was enough to offload the processing to someone else's computer.

[–] pax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

there doesn't need to be a keyboard. just good hand gestures which can't be performed by accident, and good face recognition software. if apple headset will have this, I'm gonna bankrupt.

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't think anything can actually replace the power and expressiveness of keyboards and text interfaces- that's always going to be the bottom layer for a productive setup (i.e., you need to actually be able to write code, write shell scripts etc to control your machine, etc).

Guess what I really want is just some kind of Unix machine that hums along 24/7 in the background, with many different paradigms for interacting with it when you don't have (or want) a standard keyboard and display. Putting a display over my face feels like a giant leap in the wrong direction

[–] pax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, keyboard is crucial when you want to code, 100% agree here.

[–] drwho@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I got to try messing around with a Hololens a couple of years back. The hand tracking wasn't perfect but it was pretty cool. It read my "typing in the air" gestures to set a WPA2 key very accurately (much to my surprise). The parameters of the demo I was playing around in (picking up and moving virtual packages around in a model city to control drones flying around that part of the convention center) was pretty cool.

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I don't want to use voice controls for anything but I agree with the OPs more general point of getting more capabilities out of fewer screens