Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world's users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am strongly opposed to the way this is handled. Discussing piracy may not be censored in any way and being afraid of shady lawsuits is not good, this is one of the main responsibilities of a server admin of such a grand operation. Especially so for what is effectively an image board which is grey zoning on copyright all the time. It is fine to ban communities who direct link to well known piracy sites, both because of the legal and perhaps ethical complications this brings.

We need now more than ever platforms where we defend basic freedoms as discussion of hot topics. I view the negative impact of this as banning discussion on drugs. Disclaimers about dangers and help lines for addiction should be forced, as the banning of purchase options, however please stay out of experiences, discussions and warnings on them.

[–] rich8n@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then make and host your own instance and take those risks yourself. That's the power of the Fediverse.

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't wish to have the burden and work of hosting. Same reason I use products from the supermarket and not live a survival like life in the woods. It's a bit too much.

[–] grayhaze@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sooo... you'd rather someone else do all the work and take on the burdens, but do it the way you want them to do it without contributing in any way?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Can't someone else do it?"

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Then stop bitching about what toys someone else has in their playground, you're a guest, fucking act like it.