854
submitted 11 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It (Harris) is technically backing mamdani in the least backing least him way possible, while holding her nose and making her disapproval of him very obvious. The bare minimum for making it so that technically one democrat I've heard of–other than DINO's like sanders– has backed him so we can't truthfully make the sweeping dramatic statement that "no major democrat has endorsed zohran mamdani.

It is technically an endorsement, but only technically.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago

what was the "cops are objects" comment? Was this something that kamala harris said

[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No. It was a prosecutor–which is a kind of cop.

It has not apologized condemned or made amends for its past behavior–therefore it is still a cop.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I loathe harris but calling her "it" is pretty douchey. Why do that? Why attack her gender? Did her gender in particular do something to you?

[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's a cop. Cops aren't people. Thus 'it'.

We do not typically gender objects in English.

In Spanish or French I would use the feminine singular form of whatever the fuck I was calling it. I am not speaking Spanish or French. I am speaking English. So I use 'it'.

Edit: I'm informed there is a specific term for female pig, 'sow'–which would also be correct but that has some misogynist connotations, and the correct pronoun remains 'it'.

[-] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

You may not be trying to misgender Harris, but using object pronouns as if they're an inherently bad thing is pretty insensitive to those who use it/its pronouns

Also, dehumanizing the enemy is pretty slippery rhetoric. You can admit/accept that they're people while advocating for violence against them regardless

[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's not inherently bad. There are plenty of objects ive been very fond of over the years. None of them were cops, but, you know, stuffed animals, buildings, a pot that I bought in a shopping trip with someone I loved but had a really complicated relationship with and cooked a lot of meals with over the years. All properly 'it's, though i admit some of the stuffed animals did get gendered; I was a small child.

A cop is not a person. It can't be (safely) talked with, can't communicate honestly, does not have human compassion, does not self reflect, does not have capacity for critical thought in any way that matters. In both practical and philosophical terms–cops are missing some important parts of 'person'.

Some of the people who kill me in the water wars in a few years might be people(but who the fuck knows at this point). And I bet I'll want to kill them (for their water). The tankies who try to murder me if we pull off a revolution will probably be people (if its still soon enough that they don't have the cops do it). Cops are not people–if they were, they wouldn't be cops.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago
[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Liberals: Don't dehumanize police!

Also liberals: You're stupid and have a mental illness! I bet you suck bad man's cock like a fuckin queer!!

[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 2 points 11 months ago

A cutting and insightful critique that makes all of our ideas better. Thank you.

[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 5 points 11 months ago
[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Cops aren't people. I will not talk about a cop in such a way as to leave a reader with the impression it's a person–you can do that inclusive of gender in many languages. English is not one of them.

Unless you mean English. Then yes–absolutely weapon of the enemy, but I don't speak anything else well enough to get by.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

you've lost me again (not an american)

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

He's saying that she's not a person because cops don't deserve to be considered people.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago

Oh!

it’s (cops are objects not people)

"It" being Harris, and the parenthesis part being the posters sentiment, not Harris's

I thought Harris had at some point said that cops were not people, which would be an amazing thing for her to say.

Sorry, I get it now

[-] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -1 points 11 months ago

Correct. 'It' referring to Harris and an explanation of why I'm not talking like it's a person (because it is not).

Its supporters have not said cool things. Maybe ever. When talking, they mostly just blame 'tankies' and other people whose loyalty their masters were entitled to not voting for their defeat in the last election. Very loudly and vitriolically, in a way sure to build strong coalitions in the future. There's a chance they're all bots. Nobody actually liked it.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
854 points (98.6% liked)

News

38974 readers
2362 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS