this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
184 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7487 readers
11 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hot damn, in just over a week. Data from https://the-federation.info/node/details/25274. Made in GIMP.

Thank you Chris, alyaza, Gaywallet again for making such a nice place and managing this explosion in popularity, to the mods and other people keeping it operating, and lastly to everyone joining, contributing, posting and commenting and be(e)ing friendly!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. Over at lemmy.ca there were just a handful of users posting regularly making up the entire feed until recently, now it looks like it's starting to pick up as well. That is probably the story of all growing Fediverse communities lately.

Lemmy is not a publicly traded company so growth is not the paramount priority of its existence, but it is certainly great to have a sizeable place where there are enough people around who care about each other.

[–] manifex@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The community feel is tangible and the methodology is distributed in nature... win/win for socializing online, IMO.

[–] bdonvr@lemmy.rogers-net.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy doesn't need infinite growth and ever more value extraction from its users as a traditional company would, but a sizable userbase is definitely a good thing. There's a certain critical mass that any social site needs.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I'd love to hear more about your thoughts on critical mass. The way I see it, there's many levels of critical mass but each come with various levels of trade-off.