this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
549 points (97.1% liked)
pics
29473 readers
604 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don’t know if it’s unbelievable good or unbelievable bad from the title.
Having gone through their post history, they're generally very appreciative of simple things and beautiful sights, so I'd assume unbelievably good =)
You are correct. I can't believe we actually did it. (We're back now.)
As long as you had fun, nothing else mattress
Daaaaad. Get off the internet
Not until your Mother gets me off 😎
That was bed.
I'm trying to come up with more bed puns but nothing is springing to mind.
How early did the boat traffic start? Was the place deserted enough to boink before bedtime?
There were only 10 tour boats in the park while we were there, according to the guide. I can only remember seeing one or two on the whole trip. We were two of us on the boat plus the crew which consisted of a guide, a captain, a helper, and a cook. They slept below. How quiet are you?
So did tell us about the muskitoes, were there nets?
Yes, there were mosquito nets and no, they weren't bad. I barely noticed any. We're from Northern Canada so perhaps we are immune.
I just went through your post history too (Also from Northern Ontario).
I love your adventures! Hope you post more pictures.
Wholesome internet stalking
(I use the word "stalking" in jest. I am amused because usually when one has cause to "stalk" a user's post history, it's because there's some drama or dirt that turns up. I always feel awkward and a bit vulnerable when I reflect on how people can peruse your post history at will, but I find the wholesomeness of this subverts the anxiety I usually feel at this prospect. It's scary that we can quickly find enough to summarise a person's online presence, but "generally very appreciative of simple things and beautiful sights" is a lovely thing to be, and makes me wonder how I would come across at a glance. Good, I hope — because it turns out that it is possible to have positive conversations with internet strangers)
Ironic that you should mention dirt and drama in one's post history when you're the same person who posted this:
Pumpkin ginger carrot
I've cooked this! Successfully! Multiple times! Some even with homegrown Hokkaido pumpkins. And it was delicious. So proud ;)
I'm not looking for any trouble, buddy.
Hmmm, I guess I never really thought to divide my soups by season.
You're not gonna eat pumpkin soup in the summer!? Gazpacho in winter, God forbid!?
Sure why not.
Pardon my French, but you've lost your marbles.
Well I never...
I'm not clear on the irony here. Or is the joke about how the autumn soup comment is like the opposite of dirt and drama?
(In hindsight, I shouldn't be surprised that my comment led to people looking at my post history)
Yeah, it's the second one. Looking into YOUR post history to see how you like it, but posting only the most innocuous thing.
More like snooping
The important thing these days is: it must be Instagram worthy. That's all that matters.
You could say that's all that mattress? ... I..I show myself out
You did good. You can stay
No, that pun was sheet
The picture's not terribly Instagram worthy, but it looks like a really cool trip and I'd love to do that.
Ugh... Right.... Today I was at a place with my partner and a group of younger (not as in young, just younger than us) girls behind us. They were talking about some place they were familiar with and how cute it was, how they hadn't been there in so long
"That's like the most instagramable place ever!" I swear I could see the back of my skull, that's how hard my eyes rolled
Told my partner, "I guess we judge places by how instagram worthy they are.." Their reply, "so cringe"
I don't use any of that stuff. Still, I don't have an issue with the language. It sounds like they just mean it's cute. I use the word "Google" to refer to web searches, but I don't use Google.
I think policing language is stupid. You can't know what they meant from what they said. They could be saying they only like it to share on social media, or it could have meant it's just really cute. I think judging the language of strangers beyond this is just a waste of energy and a good way to make yourself feel worse —I say this fully recognizing that I'm doing the same thing.
I guess that depends on whether said orangutans are brachiators or swingers? 🤷🏼♂️
Being swingers doesn't guarantee they'll wwnt to fuck OP though
Ain't that always the hurdle w/ swingers, though. 😅😶🌫️
Probably matters more whether mosquitoes are a problem in that area.
Hey, now. Don't kinkshame. Some people are totally into little pricks. 🤌🏼
Also depends on the community. Some would be like: OMG, obviously, the mattress cover has not been ironed!
Nah that's good. A proper mattress shouldn't be taken for granted outside of the west.