611
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sudo@programming.dev 27 points 10 months ago

Tbh Biden could've shut them up pretty easily by not spending tax payer money on genocide. Sounds like the best of both worlds to me.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why does everyone assume that this would have won the election for Democrats?

In fact, I keep being told that there weren't enough protest non-voters to sway the election for Trump. Just completely contradictory.

[-] sudo@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago

There's absolutely way more simply apathetic non-voters who saw two candidates promising more austerity and genocide and said "shits fucked yo" and didn't bother. You can call those people stupid but you'd be dumber for thinking that will get them to vote for your candidate.

If anything the uncommitted campaign was warning about that.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Why does everyone assume that this would have won the election for Democrats?

Because genocide supporting centrists keep blaming the anti-genocide left for harris' loss.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
611 points (94.2% liked)

People Twitter

10372 readers
1202 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS