78
submitted 1 year ago by SourGumGum@lemmy.world to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No this is an actual problem, complying with the rules can cost a not insignificant amount of money, deliberate or not its essentially a way to price smaller competitors out of the market. Same thing should happen to lemmy under the same law in about 20 years when the UK government gets around to learning it exists.

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 1 year ago

It's almost as if the effort was financially backed by the failing web2.0 empire (aka centralized social media and Big Tech webpages) specifically to help it remain competitive against the rising wave of web3.0 sources (decentralization such as the Fediverse). Oh ah, I mean "for the children", yeah...

[-] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You vastly overestimate the influence of the fediverse. This is a cash grab and a monitoring scheme, nothing more or less. Bills like this have been proposed in the us and uk since before web 2.0 was a fever dream of the most deranged creatives rooming with engineers.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2538 readers
1222 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great News Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS