this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
92 points (96.9% liked)

Apple

17352 readers
138 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apple works hard to make sure they don’t seem cheap. Their content has been top notch. But it can be really easy for 3D to make a movie worse. I think you’re right to be nervous.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m inclined to think 3D makes movies worse because it’s only typically used for gimmicky effects partially limited by the active/passive glasses. When you’re wearing a full visor and your entire field of vision is essentially “generated”, the illusion of 3D should become much more immersive than what could be offered by a red/blue or active shutter glasses.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It makes sense that this could be really cool. But when it’s rendered for 2D screens it still needs to look great and not feel gimmicky.

[–] UlfKirsten@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Oh well let’s hope I’m wrong