this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
66 points (97.1% liked)

Videos

18607 readers
238 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Louis Rossman's Fulu Foundation has a few bounties available to to those who are able to come up with methods for removing ads from your fridge, making the Xbox Series X repairable, getting the Nest 1&2 to work with Home Assistant, etc.

More details here: https://bounties.fulu.org/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago

Following up on this. I sent an email out to the team and got a response already.

To summarize, they would rather the solution work through updates for security fixes, but they were willing to compromise if automatic updates were disabled with the option for users to manually update somehow:

Tap for email/responseInitial email:

Hi,

Just a quick question about this point in the bounty:

  - Restore the fridge to its original functionality, by removing any possibility of adverts being presented on the display (all other smart features must be retained)

When you say, "all other smart features must be retained" does this mean that the solution must retain the ability to allow the fridge to automatically update its firmware if Samsung pushes out a future update?

Would it be okay if, instead, we disabled the automatic update but still allowed the end user to manually update if they really wanted to?

Or would it be okay if the end user could just reapply the solution after an official firmware update?

Thanks,
<Redacted>

Response:

Hey <Redacted>,

Just chatted with the team, and we think it would be better for it to have updates, and optional ones sounds like a sensible compromise. We don't want to sacrifice security for control. I hope that answers your question. Thanks!