831
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Access fills a very specific niche that is right in between "too big for Excel" and "too small for SQL Express".

The problem is that this window is very narrow, and after just a small amount of growth, it suddenly makes sense to migrate again to proper SQL. In my(admittedly limited) experience it was almost always better to just skip Access.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

I wish there was something in between but based on SQLite.

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Honestly, projects like AppSmith and Baserow are pretty good at this. Google AppSheet is by far the best implementation of this style of low-to-no-code app builders, but comes with the obvious caveat of being a Google product.

If someone managed to make an open-source solution as slick as Google’s, I’d be right on it. As it stands, all the competition that I’ve found requires a decent existing knowledge of SQL queries to run the widgets themselves.

[-] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The problem with using google instead of open source is that one day your shit suddenly has ads or ceases to exist.

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I just did some digging and Grist actually seems to do most of what I need it to. There may be hope yet! It’s still not quite as slick as AppSheet, but may be a step in the right direction.

[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Search for "low-code app frameworks", there are a whole bunch, they fill the same niche now that Access once did (though these tend to be cloud based, not local sqlite). Baserow is a great open-source example.

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Access is one of those programs that was a game changer in its day. Desktop databases became popular in the 80's for orgs that either couldn't afford or didn't need a mainframe.

All the other competing desktop database systems were slow to transition from MS-DOS to Windows and Access offered quite a few features that the others didn't have. Microsoft included Access with Office 95 and every office version thereafter. That pretty much wiped out the rest of the competition.

Access has just outlived it's usefulness. Better solutions exist now. Microsoft seems aware of that since they've done basically nothing to it since 2016. They're probably just keeping it around for the enterprise customers who are too stubborn to migrate off it yet.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
831 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

10427 readers
835 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS