250
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hannibal@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I am not trying to be political or upset anybody of either side. I blame Joe Biden for this, before you judge or get upset or disagree with me--just wait. I believe this is particularly the reason she lost. She was left only from July to November to figure out her platform, determine a potential running mate, and come up with ideas.

Usually they start campaigning around the midterms leaving nearly 2 years. She only had 4-5 months to prepare. She had limited amount of time to prepare her political campaign, to figure out her agenda how to get her message out there to everybody. Wait for time for people to hear it. They were not sure of her policies, they thought she was just an extension of Joe Biden because she didn't have time.

This is just one factor. She did a very excellent job for the few months she had left. She could have done a better job if Joe Biden had not ran a second term.

Then it upset people that Democrats didn't hold an open primary. She would have still won most likely, but for the younger generation and others. It was a turn off, they said it was a form of tyranny. (Of course it wasn't. Even Republican party in 2020 cancelled primaries in some states)

Then you had states cleaning up the 'voting rolls' people didn't realize they were unregistered, and ran out of time to register again. In a lot of states, I don't believe you can register on the day you vote. I might be wrong though.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

No she is rightfully to blame. Her platform was “Nothing will change” and “Israel has a right to defend itself”. If she would have not said those 2 things she would have won.

[-] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 months ago

Well I'm pretty sure with a longer campaign he team would've figured out "I'll keep doing what Biden is doing" was a losing message and dropped it. I don't think there was any chance of them acknowledging the genocide in Gaza by Nov '24, because the general public hadn't come around on it by then.

I don't know if that would've changed the outcome.

Biden should've kept his promise to be transitional and let there be an honest to god Democratic primary.

[-] rafoix@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago

She pushed a very popular and likable Tim Walz out of the way to put a fucking Cheney front and center. Cheney are historically evil people.

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

She refused to appear in unscripted events. People point to Trump's podcast appearances as the reason he won, but in my opinion it's closer to the truth to say that Kamala refusing to appear unless everything was closely controlled is what really cost her.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Some of that may also be that the secret service doesn't allow for to much non "closely controlled" environments. Not sure exactly how that works, but I assume you have to let them know where you are going to be in advance and they figure out who is going to be there and set perimeter and everything else, which if you are nervous I imagine you fall into a "I should prepare for this interview" having hours/possibly days to do so.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

She was left only from July to November to figure out her platform, determine a potential running mate, and come up with ideas.

She didn't have too little time. She had too much time. She could have won if Biden had died a week before the election, and she had to take over last minute. The peak of her popularity was right when she got the candidacy. And it was all downhill from there. The more voters got to know her, the less they liked her. If she had had more time, it would have been much worse.

She was a deeply unlikable candidate that ran dead last in the primary she ran in. She was chosen by Biden as VP precisely because she was seen as unelectable and thus not a serious rival for Biden's position.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
250 points (93.1% liked)

politics

31115 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS