446
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Likewise, how "few" casualties there were in actual battle. Fiction shows both sides duking it out until they're both effectively wiped out. In real life, if 10% of an army was dead or incapacitated, the battle was over. There would be a rout, a retreat, and depending on the details, another battle a few days or weeks later.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 27 points 10 months ago

And if you were a knight of nobility you would surrender with the expectation to be ransomed.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago

Remember limited warfare? That was awesome.

[-] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 10 months ago

Yeah turns out seeing your buddies get stabbed isn't great for morale.

[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 11 points 10 months ago

Very true!

A fighting retreat is an incredibly difficult maneuver to pull off, but if managed, it means that what could have been an utter massacre is reduced to simply damaging. A commander - and a military force - that knows when to fold 'em in that context of high-casualty retreats is worth their weight in gold.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
446 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

2990 readers
315 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

  6. Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS