this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
1782 points (98.1% liked)

News

23437 readers
3372 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pope Francis condemned the "very strong, organised, reactionary attitude" in the US church and said Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Pope Francis has blasted the “backwardness” of some conservatives in the US Catholic Church, saying they have replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Francis’ comments were an acknowledgment of the divisions in the US Catholic Church, which has been split between progressives and conservatives who long found support in the doctrinaire papacies of St John Paul II and Benedict XVI, particularly on issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Isn't god supposed to be unchanging according to their book?

[–] deadbeef79000 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Atheist here. But I'll put a Christian hat on for a sec.

Humans are fallable. God isn't. Human interpretation of God's will is fallible. Therefore the church must adapt as humans become better at diving God's will.

Hat off.

I don't think that's a contradiction. Now I'm going to stand in my garage for an hour and sing, hoping it'll make me a good car.

[–] Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (38 children)

I never understood this argument. If God is all powerful how come he leaves his messages to interpretation. Shouldn't we all just be born knowing the exact wording and understanding? Also why does he need people to write his books and teach his lessons when again he supposedly is all powerful and could make it so we were born with this knowledge instead of leaving it to idiots who can't "comprehend God's great plan".

[–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago

It's a way to select the good ones for his next experiment.

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ever have a dog? You really love the dog and the dog is smart for a dog, but no matter how hard you train them they won't really understand you. You can get them to follow a few rules , but after a certain point you can't really train them much more.

People can't even handle the few very basic messages that were already laid out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it seems ridiculous now that I've deconverted and can finally look at this critically from the outside. It would be like raising a kid by leaving them a letter. If the god existed surely they would have the bright idea to drop some updated material every few decades and maybe make the occasional clarifying announcement to humanity.

Having a collection of religious texts, physically recorded by human hands, that provide information about the religion is a feature consistent with any religion that has a human-fabricated deity. Coincidentally, it is also a feature of every major religion. 🤔

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the god existed surely they would have the bright idea to drop some updated material every few decades and maybe make the occasional clarifying announcement to humanity.

Oh, but God does and coincidentally God's will always coincides with what the person proclaiming to relay God's will wants to be true .

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the god existed surely they would have the bright idea to drop some updated material every few decades

this was part of what Jesus was supposed to do, actually.

[–] deadbeef79000 1 points 1 year ago

... and Mohammed... and Joseph Smith...

Depending on which items of Abrahamic scripture you consider canon.

[–] deadbeef79000 3 points 1 year ago

Ssssh. It's just a way to control Pharaoh's slaves.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doctrinally god can remain infallible while altering his message to be what humans of a given time and place are ready to hear and act upon. Are your parents hypocrites for letting you drive a car at 16 but not at 4?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I knew a guy who thought like this, (Rest in peace, Robotech_Master, I miss you everyday)

He was a Christian who had a rather unorthodox way of interpreting the bible.

His take was that God is real, souls are real, and there is indeed a life after this one.

However he didn't believe in anything supernatural.

He believed God was simply a being beyond human comprehension who didn't have a good way of explaining the universe to a simple primitive species like man. So he dumbed it down with supersitions and myths in order to keep man heading in the right direction.

For example

God couldn't get an ancient people to understand shellfish kills you if you cook it wrong, so he just made up a rule that said "You will be killed by my divine wraith if you eat this! So you better not!"

And then when Jesus came along and humans knew how to cook shellfish properly he dropped a line about how "the old law doesn't apply anymore"

He believes Heaven and Hell, the Resurrection of Christ, and Souls were all legit... and have a rational explanation, man is just too inexperienced to understand the specifics beyond some colorful scripture and a few divinely inspired paintings right now.

For his sake I hope he was right, coming up on the anniversary of his tragic hit and run...

[–] deadbeef79000 1 points 1 year ago

Doctrinally...

Yes, that's my point with "diving God's will".

I'm not sure what you mean by the car-hypocrite bit though.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good car? What the fuck are you talking about?

[–] deadbeef79000 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a reference to a quote, the providence of which I know not:

Going to church does not make you a good Christian any more than standing in my garage makes me a good car.

Jesus warned of being like the hypocrites when your relationship to God should be personal (and private).

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] deadbeef79000 2 points 1 year ago
[–] GrandpaDJ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That is a solid response. Thank you.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's actually more of a doctrine that is made up by the organization and less something explicitly stated in the book. There probably are some psalms or other references that use the word (translated as) "unchanging", but in context, the original audience would probably not have interpreted it in the same way. Think God's love and power will never fail, not God will literally never experience anything or change. In the 10 commandments story, Moses has a conversation with god and changes his mind.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of things like this.

The Levitical Law condemning Homosexuality was originally one condemning Pedophilia, but King James changed it in his translation in order to throw off suspicions that he was gay, which he totally was.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It's actually somewhat more complicated than that, and relates to the evolution of English words. The word "fornication" I believe was in a state of evolution when KJV was written, originally having a meaning more in-line with "married people who visit prostitutes" (a major issue of the day). It quickly evolved to include all premarital and homosexual relations. I'm not sure how cleanly the timing is, but King James himself had male lovers.

I am of the belief that KJV was not anti-gay as written. Language just caught up to it. It wasn't a big stretch, as homophobia was a common unofficial position pretty much unbroken between 100AD and 1500AD or so.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What? Definitely not.

At least catholic christianity emphasizes how Jesus brought change to the jewish traditions on how to live "close to god". Change is a thing in the catholic church, which is exactly why people have tried to make a lot of things they liked into unchanging doctrines over the centuries.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ever heard of the new testament?

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not sure about the details but God being unchanging shouldnt coflict with humans changing.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. If you read it Jesus specifically says that he came to amend the word of god. That's how we got bacon cheeseburgers and cotton-poly blend shirts back. Shame he didn't say anything about racism or homophobia but what are you gonna do?

[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The concepts of racism was quite different then as to now and was addressed. Basically the story of the 'Good Samaritan" needed to add the 'good' because Samaritans were discriminated against and though of as poorly as racists do today.

Homophobia is basically covered in a bunch of places where in general you are supposed to love and treat people well. Jesus gave MANY examples of directly treating people who were not in good social, or religious, graces with kindness,openness and compassion. Basically the worse someone is the more you have to try and show love. I'm not sure at all how basically the complete opposite is the practice. There is some epic level mental gymnastics to get there.

Now slavery, umm... yeah. God was like , here are some rules on how to treat your slaves. You know because that is a thing and should keep being one. I'm glad this one is opposite in practice.

load more comments (1 replies)