this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
750 points (87.4% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3644 readers
301 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The number of negative and/or "just vote for democrats idiot" comments shows how brainwashed and doomed Americans really are.

Nobody's saying that voting for the just a tiny bit slightly less evil party is wrong and you shouldn't do it. What people are saying is that it will solve nothing and lead to no real change. At best it'll result in Americans being ever so slightly less abused on a daily basis. Which is of course better, but still shit. That's the main point.

To most people, it's fine to vote for liars, scumbags, criminals, and pedophiles, as long as they're the least bad available candidates. However, if you're struggling with admitting that they are indeed liars, scumbags, criminals, and pedophiles, and should be at best put in prison, then I'm sorry to say, but there may not be hope for you.

Even if Americans managed to get rid of the entire republican party, and have a government purely made of democrats, it'd still be a far-right government, one of the worst on the planet. Let that sink in. All Americans deserve better. As a matter of fact, all humans deserve a better American government, since it unfortunately impacts us all. But you're not gonna get anything close to a resonably good one by voting. It's just not happening in our lifetimes. Likely not even our children's. If you genuinely wish for a decent life, then you can either leave the country or prepare for mass riots. I know it sucks, but that's the reality Americans - and everybody else - live in.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (34 children)

Choosing not to vote because "both parties bad" empowers the GOP and teaches the Dems to drift right because they keep losing to conservative candidates.

You move the party left by voting in the primaries for the progressive candidates. But you also need to vote for whoever gets nominated, even if they're not progressive enough. Choosing not to vote for the Dems is beneficial to the Republicans, and supports everything that's happening right now.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

teaches the Dems to drift right because they keep losing to conservative candidates.

lmao right, they rigged their primaries against Bernie's leftist populism because they were just too stupid to understand how much people want houses and healthcare, not because they're owned by capitalist oligarchs or anything

🤡

Genocidaires and their symps get no votes, sorry. I do not care if what I do is beneficial to the Republicans over the Democrats because I do not regard them as being meaningfully worse than Democrats in their actions, only in their rhetoric. My actual goal is for my actions to be contrary to the interests of the empire, and voting for Blue MAGA is decidedly not that.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bernie lost the primaries. They weren't "rigged". Clinton got more votes. I teach at a university, and I don't know how many kids I ran into who talked big game about supporting Sanders, but couldn't be bothered to go to their home districts and actually vote for him.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Choosing not to vote because “both parties bad” empowers the GOP

  • If you don't vote, it's your fault that we lost

  • We don't owe you anything

Dems need to pick one

John Fetterman being a perfect example of this dynamic in action

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

If more of people bothered to fucking vote in the primaries instead of bitching about who was selected, then Fetterman wouldn't be in office.

The hard reality is we have a 2-party system and choosing to not participate doesn't accomplish anything but empower those who least-represent your interests.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago

If more of people bothered to fucking vote in the primaries instead of bitching about who was selected, then Fetterman wouldn’t be in office.

fetterman ran as a progressive in his primary

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The vote blew no matter who crew is who gave us Fetterman. They were willing to overlook his right-wing tendencies so that the blue team could be the fascist running things. The only purpose of the primary is to allow the party significant time to manufacture your approval for their hand selected candidate

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

You have 2 options in November. Fully-support Trump and the GOP through either voting Republican or not voting at all, or voting for the Dems, who are less-bad and can be changed over time.

If you aren't supporting the Dems at the ballot, you're declaring that you support ICE, the Iran and Venezuelan wars, the blockade of Cuba, the gutting of the administrative state, the suppression of the vote, the removal of Healthcare for millions, the millions of deaths from cuts to USAID, and more.

So either try and slow the bleeding or just put on the fucking red hat.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Fully-support Trump and the GOP through either voting Republican or not voting at all,

not voting is not fully supporting trump.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you aren’t supporting the Dems at the ballot, you’re declaring that you support ICE, the Iran and Venezuelan wars, the blockade of Cuba, the gutting of the administrative state, the suppression of the vote, the removal of Healthcare for millions, the millions of deaths from cuts to USAID, and more.

this is a false dichotomy

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

can be changed over time.

Can they though? They were the conservative party before Nixon, and clinton and obama both governmened from the center right. There is no history of the democrats ever being progressive besides a few politicians like Sanders Warren AOC. They never had a progressive party leader.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In hypothetical primary races between AOC and Schumer, polls have shown thay AOC would clean house. And that's what needs to happen. New Yorkers need to fire Schumer in 2028 by selecting a progressive democract.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but the Democrat party will never do that. Theyd rather lose to a maga Republican than allow a progressive to effect the will of the People.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Interesting how you're using the "Democrat Party" epithet used by conservative influencers and trolls in a thread where a bunch of you are trying to convince people that it's morally superior to not vote at all than to vote for opponents of the GOP.

Their not opponents they're all friends, just like five house reps including one Republican who are against trump, the rest of them are just along for the trump ride and making money off insider trading before trump announcements. Didn't say it was better not to vote, still vote for the lesser of two evils but yeah they're both evil, just one is good about saying nice things about poor people while fucking them

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

YOU have two options in November. The red fascist or the blue fascist. If you believe that Democrats can be changed over time then why have people been having the same discussions for decades. WEB DuBois was talking about Democrats claiming to be the lesser evil in 1956.

Under Biden ice received the largest increase of federal funding that they have ever received. They recognized Trump's hand-picked president Guiado of Venezuela until they had to negotiate with Venezuela and then they recognized Maduro. So yes, we would be in the exact same situation with Democrats in office.

USAID was always a tool of regime change. The US created the circumstances that they would need aid, then come rushing in to provide the aid with strings attached.

Lesser evil is something that Democrats tell themselves so they can forget that they chose evil

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You cannot vote your way out of fascism. You can vote in all the progressive candidates that you want and until they are deemed to not be a threat to the status quo, they will be given no positions of power to threaten the status quo. The reform bullshit lines that they give you only prolongs their existence. They promise you that change is just right around the corner. If only you stick around long enough. Karl Marx talked about these exact same scenarios in 1860 and people are still waiting on fundamental change. In the words of James Baldwin, how much time do you want for your progress?

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody’s saying that voting for the just a tiny bit slightly less evil party is wrong and you shouldn’t do it.

I am, actually. Signing your name to greenlight internationally-recognized genocide in order to protect your own comfort - in other words, valuing your privilege above the actual lives of thousands of other human beings - is wrong and you shouldn't do it.

If you're told that's the cost to save our nation, or to avoid having to fight a fascist government, or whatever other bullshit Blue MAGA wants to sell you, the correct and moral response is, "That price is too high and I refuse."

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I totally understand your sentiment and I believe a very interesting, as well as productive discussion can, and perhaps should, be made on this topic.

Of course, I have no doubts there are many people who'd completely agree with your stance. This was, however, not the main focus of the discussion, which is why I decided to leave it on the side.