this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
61 points (94.2% liked)
Firefox
7410 readers
4 users here now
A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Anyone know how this compares, performance and security wise, to uBlock?
Is this a step towards implementing Google's same extension restrictions in FF, setting themselves up as the primary arbiter of adblock tools?
In today's day and age adblocking feels like a core function of a browser, but also why replace something that works perfectly well with extensions?
Mixed feelings on this one.
It's probably faster than using an extension, especially if we're talking about the mobile version of Firefox, which is still very unoptimized compared to Chrome-based browsers.
I don't know about this specifically, but Rust in general is fast and at least memory safe (which helps with general security but doesn't guarantee it at by any means).
I also used Brave for quite a while and anecdotally it was quite fast. So in my personal experience the performance is good.
I don't see it as a step towards bring google-like, personally. But who knows with FF these days
I wouldn't expect that:
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/firefox-manifest-v3-adblockers/
and
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/03/13/manifest-v3-manifest-v2-march-2024-update/
So even if that would change (which I'd be very surprised by), it wouldn't happen for another twelve months, so plenty of time for outrage then.