280
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
280 points (97.3% liked)
politics
30954 readers
2068 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Impeaching Trump will not remove him and is political theater since there is no way they will have 67 senate votes. It should be done anyway as a matter of principle, but should not be a top priority.
They somehow found the Senate votes for making the Epstein files release into law. (A law which the regime is now blatantly and unapologetically violating.)
What would have happened there if House Dems just sat on their thumbs and said, "There is no way we will have the votes in the Senate for this"?
The Dems have got to stop assuming defeat before they even try.
It's also not beneficial to waste political capital on extreme long shots. Impeach as a matter of principal, but don't make it a primary focus.
I kind of take objection to the entire concept of 'political capital', spoken of as if it's an exchange currency that gets used up and permanently goes away when you spend it. It stinks of corrupt and opaque backroom deals and quid pro quo. And, as is the case here, it creates and justifies self-defeating attitudes, where politicians very often don't dare to do the right thing, because they can't risk 'spending' their precious 'political capital' on the right thing when they're saving it up for something else they might possibly need it for later. How many politicians have ended their terms with 'political capital' still left unspent in their account? That shit has an expiration date -- it makes no sense to hoard it!
Instead, just do the right thing (to the best of your ability to determine what the 'right thing' is) immediately and unrelentingly, at every turn. Never hold back.
And I also only ever hear it as an explanation of why Dems "can't" do the right thing. When have you ever heard Republicans talking about how they can't do something because they 'don't have the political capital'? No, they just do it. And if their bill/resolution/whatever fails to pass, they just do it again. And again. How many times did they try to repeal the Affordable Care Act? They obviously didn't have the 'political capital' to pull that off, but it didn't stop them from trying over and over again anyway. Why can't the Dems have a bit of that energy when it comes to doing things that might benefit the country? (I know, trick question. The real reason they can't do that is because they're bought and paid for by corporate interests. 'Political capital' is just another convenient excuse they trot out in the all-too-frequent case of when the interests of their donors aren't aligned with the interests of their voters.)