this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
169 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7498 readers
46 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A commune or a cult would be better than this circus lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Already looking for a land that might be livable in 10/15 years

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

how far along is your rocket?

[–] badelf@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m thinking… North.

And not low lying near a coast.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I (and I'm sure a lot of other people) had thought of that too, but now the whole North is on fire.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but that means it’s on a fire sale! points to temple

In 20 years you’ll be relaxing in mild weather while Santa tried to keep the reindeer from burning alive.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah but that means it’s on a fire sale! points to temple

Haha, smart!

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably hill zones: the land is easier to work than mountains, close to the plains (where there are natural water reserves) but still high enough to have lower temperatures

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking the foothills of the Canadian Rockies

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

"Might" or "should"? A lot of land "might" be livable, some different land "should" be livable if you build a fallout shelter and a bio-dome.