297

Bastards

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 3 months ago

California should freeze federal tax payments.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago

Put it in an escrow account and use it to replace the lost medicaid and other funding.

when the feds hold up their end of the deal, they get to have the remaining funds.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

I'm not sure how practical that is (seems like it would be more complicated than that). But if something like that could be done it would be great.

Conservatives want to try starving vulnerable Californians? Without our revenue dozens of red states will start starving. Would be funny seeing this administration shoot itself in the foot yet again.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I bet one of the biggest employers in California is the state itself. They simply need to tell people they are holding withholding in escrow and that any irs actions are to be forwarded to their new special tax team.

Then invite all other employers to join.

It wouldn’t be easy but the threat of it happening would bring the administration to the table. What happens when welfare states find out that the big blue boogeyman on the west coast is funding their entire existence? Will they fall in line behind republicans or will they decide to sit out the next vote?

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

Not just California, but most of the Northeast as well

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Also, it seems that Californians send their tax payments to Fresno. So they could just, yah know. "oopsiedoodles we raided your tax office on dubious pretenses. It's cool cuz you do that to state's voting agencies..."

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 months ago

We (CA) pay far, far, far more into the federal system than we take out. We're literally the fourth largest GDP in the WORLD.

This is such a fucking stupid thing for this administration to do. This is why it's important to learn to read, everyone.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

Age old question... Is he being stupid or purposefully doing stupid things for Russia's benefit?

this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
297 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30954 readers
2265 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS