this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
423 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

20807 readers
1156 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bert_brause@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (4 children)

what? Sorry, what does it mean? I cheated my way trough computer science - archeology / biology are not my expertise.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think it means we don't know what the ancestors of those plants are/what they evolved from. They just kinda showed up in the fossil record.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which, tbf, it's a miracle enough of the fossil record exists as is. I'm sure there was a LOT that was lost to the sands of time

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Iirc it's reckoned most species likely aren't known about because most places weren't conducive to fossilisation

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

ehh, modern biology doesn't construct evolutionary history from fossil records, but from genetic similarities.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's impossible to compare genetics from fossils and we can't study ancient long dead species besides fossil records for the most part.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yeah that's not what i meant. phylogenetic trees are constructed by considering the genetics of recent (living) species, not from fossils.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And this post is about ancestors of ferns which are unknown so I'm not sure what are you suggesting

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago
[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Relatively few lifeforms end up fossilizing and then some of those fossils later get eroded. The percentage that make it to the present is low.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

I'm no paleontologist but it seems like our total knowledge of certain eras comes from a few river banks collapsing on whatever lived there. That's not going to be a great representation of all life at that time.

[–] lemonskate@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That the fossil record is incomplete

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your mom's record is incomplete

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago

But she's working on it...

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It means our knowledge of their ancestry cuts off at that point. Anything else is speculation without additional information.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is exactly what the comic says but its not true, fossil records for ferns go back to the devonian several 100 million years before the Cretaceous

https://www.ontariobeneathourfeet.com/dinosaur-salad-ancient-extant-ferns

https://www.amerfernsoc.org/about-ferns

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 11 points 2 months ago

That's why he's so cranky in frame 4, he's realizing his piece of shit brain lied to him again.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Imagine you are trying to infer the structure of a tree by only know the positions of its leaves. Now imagine doing the same, but only 1/100 of the leaves are above ground.

It's only a small fraction living organisms which remain alive today. Most species and families which have ever been are extinct. And most are so old we could never do DNA work on them. Among the living, we can do some good DNA work and that's made a huge difference. But then go back far enough and there are just massive nonconformities.