this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
423 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

20824 readers
510 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think it means we don't know what the ancestors of those plants are/what they evolved from. They just kinda showed up in the fossil record.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which, tbf, it's a miracle enough of the fossil record exists as is. I'm sure there was a LOT that was lost to the sands of time

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Iirc it's reckoned most species likely aren't known about because most places weren't conducive to fossilisation

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

ehh, modern biology doesn't construct evolutionary history from fossil records, but from genetic similarities.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's impossible to compare genetics from fossils and we can't study ancient long dead species besides fossil records for the most part.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yeah that's not what i meant. phylogenetic trees are constructed by considering the genetics of recent (living) species, not from fossils.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And this post is about ancestors of ferns which are unknown so I'm not sure what are you suggesting

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago
[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Relatively few lifeforms end up fossilizing and then some of those fossils later get eroded. The percentage that make it to the present is low.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

I'm no paleontologist but it seems like our total knowledge of certain eras comes from a few river banks collapsing on whatever lived there. That's not going to be a great representation of all life at that time.