this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
56 points (100.0% liked)

Watches

2595 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to /c/watches โ€“ A Hub for Watch Enthusiasts on Fediverse! โŒš

Whether you're a seasoned collector, a casual wearer, or just starting your horological journey, this is the place for you! Join us to:

๐Ÿ”น Discuss โ€“ Share your latest watch acquisitions, ask for advice, or geek out over movements and designs. ๐Ÿ”น Discover โ€“ Explore vintage classics, modern marvels, and upcoming releases from luxury to affordable brands. ๐Ÿ”น Learn โ€“ Get insights on watchmaking, maintenance, modding, and industry trends. ๐Ÿ”น Connect โ€“ Meet fellow enthusiasts, trade/sell watches (if allowed), and participate in events or meetups.


Rules: Be respectful, no spam, and keep discussions civil and watch-related.


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I came across this blogpost/essay on Reddit (sorry). The essay is ostensibly about the Casio F-91W, but also about the oppressiveness of the internet of things and how technology often demands so much of our attention. I thought the Lemmy community might appreciate the sentiment.

The Last Quiet Thing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Vitaly_Chernobyl@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't get it either. Could it be A.I.? I looked up the author on Mastodon. They seemed vaguely anti-ai. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[โ€“] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe, I think it's more likely just lazy writing/composition. Not that the entire thing is badly written, though it could certainly by more engaging, literarily. The whole visual article thing doesn't help imo, it disrupts the text so much, it makes it feel like they just wrote a few sentences and then added a bunch of bs to fill it out. To be clear, I don't really think this author did that (though they did needlessly repeat themselves a lot), it's just an issue I'm realizing I have with the medium.