this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
794 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

10439 readers
222 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
iopq@lemmy.world
794
Reframing smart glasses as 'pervert glasses' (this.weekinsecurity.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by XLE@piefed.social to c/privacy@lemmy.world
172 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Smart glasses equipped with cameras, microphones, and AI are a creeping privacy and security nightmare, prompting backlash.

And rightfully so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

PRIVACY NO, PROTECTION FROM VOYERISM YES.

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115

STOP MAKING IT SEEM OK TO CREEP ON PEOPLE IT'S ACTUALLY FUCKING ILLEGAL.

You phenomenal dolt, why are you advocating for women and children to be abused you dumb fucking shit

[โ€“] edible_funk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ok you preponderously ignorant fuckass, where did I ever mention voyeurism? Where did I ever make a value judgement about camera glasses. You miserable psychotic fucking creep, I literally only ever said you don't have an expectation of privacy in public and you lost your fucking mind. You dumb fucking piece of shit, learn to fucking read you fucking stupid fuck. Anybody that screams pedophile with no provocation shouldn't be participating in the public. Dumb twat, go fuck yourself.