this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
51 points (90.5% liked)

Programming

27880 readers
270 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why is learning C so much more generally useful than learning React? What I mean by the last point is that learning C tends to develop skills that are useful in a lot of other parts of software and tech work: if you know how to write decent C, you'll have a much easier time of understanding PostgreSQL internals, for example, while if you've learned React, it's anyone's guess as to whether or not that'll actually improve your HTML skills, for example.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

@apparia@discuss.tchncs.de

@rimu@piefed.social

What would you think about learning Pascal, or Ada instead of C? They are also low enough to be useful to explain everything, but have more guard rails. (and without being the latest fad that Rust is)

[–] jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Pascal was the language for teaching when I learned to code. Then Assembly X86, C, and Java. Pascal is solid.

@bluGill @rimu @apparia pascal is what I was taught in school to learn how to code

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 week ago

From the perspective of this thread they're probably similarly good and "deep". My instinct would be to err away from anything object oriented for beginners since OOP has always felt a little cultish to me and I think it's maybe something "shallow" (at least shallower than plain C) that has a habit of masquerading as the one true "deep" way to do programming.

C also has the practical advantage of being fucking everywhere.

Rust

I like Rust, but beyond the subset that is "ugly C" -- using unsafe everywhere and eschewing like 90% of std -- it's definitely shallow.