politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Sometimes I wonder what would've happened if Ray Romano had never been fired from NewsRadio and replaced by Joe Rogan early into production. He might've remained some vaguely amusing meathead opening for more talented comics at 'The Comedy Store' to this day... And the world might've been spared from 9 seasons of Everybody Loves Raymond.
Do you think the stools would have been able to handle it?
this fucking goon
You know I almost fucking appreciate it. Because it's important to me that this farce of an administration not be taken over serious, other than as something to be replaced and forgotten
A lot of progressive and "progressive" commentators of notoriety are to blame for Rogan's rise to the mainstream as a fascist icon.
Throughout 2015-2019, mainstream progressives online were constantly throwing everyone, who rightly called out MAGA for being fascists, under the bus. They did this to appeal to the average MAGA moron under the bullshit belief that these fascist assholes could be convinced to our side through decorum and treating them with respect that was NEVER reciprocated.
Joe Rogan's show was the pinnacle of where progressives would do this. The same show where fascists would be on the next episode and demonize the same progressives that were just glazing them.
This allowed Joe to pretend to be anti-establishment and "neutral" to your average dipshit, and it made grooming them into fascism all the easier for Joe to do.
I always wonder what would've happened if Lydia Lunch would've put that cigarette out in his eye like she said she would. I've realized it's a toss up. He would've either developed an intense femdomination fetish and left the public sphere entirely to be a full-time sex slave for a sadistic domme (i.e. Wachoqski sisters) or turned even more violently misogynistic than he already is. I'm not sure if either option is an improvement over what we have now, but I do think Jane Rogan could've been a great advocate for masculine tgirlism.
To think we could have gotten the Ray Romano we actually deserved...