this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
-11 points (13.3% liked)

Linuxsucks

394 readers
16 users here now

For knowledge and awareness about what using Linux is really like and pointing at its cultish toxic community. We also cover FOSS /FLOSS failures, and issues with GPL since it relates to Linux. Moderation is heavy handed to appeal to our target users.

Rules:

  1. FOSS (especially GPL) advocates and Linux (specifically GNU/Linux) evangelists aren't welcome (GNU Hurd will count as Linux). -We ask that you block us and we will perma-ban for violations of this rule.
  2. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!). No bashing other OSs or each other. We aim for a cohesive non-toxic community with the interest of cautioning people / would be victims from Linux. At our discretion, we will remove what we consider pollution.
  3. Moderators run the sub, not the users. It's not democratic, and we don't care how you think it should be run. -Feel free to make and run your own community.
  4. "Not your Billboard" -Over-represented companies will have positive posts removed and appropriate bans may be issued. -Those companies included so far will be Valve/Steam/Proton, Google, and Brave (browser).

⚠️Collection of Articles

Linux/FOSS can damage hardware or firmware

Linux Community Advice Breaks Windows

Mixing Apps Bloats LiGNUx

Linux running servers isn't a brag

Is Linux Running Games Near Windows Performance Impressive?

Wasted Ram on Different Toolkits and Distro-Agnostic Packages in Linux

Critical ISS Systems do NOT run Linux

Abandoned Software is Dangerous (and common on Linux)

FOSS Devs Quit and Sellout on Unappreciative Userbase

Firmware Flashing is Riskier on Linux

Linux Community Toxicity Ties Directly into Inferiority Complex Psychology

The Positives of Telemetry

Game Performance Impressive?

Failures of Proton

How Linux Stores Browser Passwords is a Security Issue

The Psychology of Conspiracy Thinking

Rabid LiGNUxers Ignorantly Get Angry at Devs

Does Linux Dominate SuperComputers? -Yeah, but So What!

Linux Myths Compilation

The Linux Cult - Religious Parallels

Before Wayland: “Linux is secure, Windows is insecure.” -(Selective Dishonesty)

Why Wayland is Taking so Long

Major Desktop Applications Missing on Linux

Sudoedit vs Edit as Root

Linux is NOT Great for Developers

Kernel Level Anti-Cheat is fine!

The Privacy / Security Paradox

Linux Storing Passwords as Plain Text

How to Continue Using Unsupported Windows Online on Old Hardware

Don't Trust Desktop Marketshare

Piracy is Less Harmful than GPL

The Most Influential Formerly‑Proprietary Projects that Became Important to Linux

🔐 Secure Boot + TPM 2 vs. Linux Alternatives

🛠️Checking for Linux Hardware Compatibility is Bullshit!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR: Linux’s reported desktop share has climbed into the 4–6% range depending on methodology, but once you correct for multi‑device users, survey bias, VM usage, and the shrinking denominator of “people who still use PCs at all,” the effective share looks meaningfully lower; and its future trajectory looks weirdly upward for reasons that have nothing to do with Linux winning converts.

📈These are the headline numbers from large‑scale measurement sources:

  • StatCounter global desktop share ~4.7% in 2025 Linux Commands
  • U.S. Linux desktop share ~5% in mid‑2025 Linux Commands
  • Steam Hardware Survey ~3% Linux gamers in late 2025 Linux Commands
  • Lansweeper scan of 15M consumer PCs: just over 6% Linux ZDNET

These are not measuring the same thing, and each has distortions that tend to inflate Linux’s apparent share.

Multi‑device users distort the numbers

Most Linux desktop users are enthusiasts who own multiple machines; old laptops, ThinkPads, NUCs, homelab boxes, etc. Meanwhile, the average Windows or macOS user has one primary PC or shared family PC.

This equates to a single Linux user might generate 3 - 6 “unique devices” in datasets that count devices rather than people. A typical Windows user generates 1 device.

If Linux users average even a mere 2.5 devices per person, then a measured 5% device share becomes closer to 2% actual user share.

Survey manipulation and self‑selection bias

Linux communities have a long history of:

  • Coordinated “Linux month” pushes to inflate StatCounter
  • Users spoofing user‑agents
  • VM users showing up as “Linux desktops”
  • Enthusiasts disproportionately installing Linux on old hardware that rarely appears in enterprise datasets

This is why consumer‑focused datasets (StatCounter, Steam) show higher Linux share than enterprise datasets (Lansweeper’s AD‑managed systems show only 1.9% Linux vs 6% consumer) ZDNET.

The more enthusiast‑heavy the dataset, the higher Linux appears.

Virtual machines and WSL muddy the waters

VMs and WSL instances often register as distinct “Linux devices”, Separate “Linux browsers”, Additional “Linux Steam clients” (for people testing Proton or running niche games). One Windows host, two Linux VMs and one WSL instance can appear as four Linux desktops in some datasets.

The shrinking PC user base paradoxically boosts Linux’s percentage

This is the most under‑discussed factor by others, but I've brought up a few times in this subreddit: As normies abandon PCs for phones and tablets, the remaining Linux PC‑using population increases in share. Linux adoption isn’t rising because Linux is winning the mainstream. It’s rising because the mainstream is leaving the denominator entirely.

If 20% of casual Windows users disappear into iPads and Chromebooks, Linux’s percentage rises even if the absolute number of Linux users stays flat.

A realistic adjusted estimate

Let’s correct the inflated numbers!

  • Start with 4.7–6% measured device share
  • Subtract multi‑device inflation (factor ~2–3×) -> 1.5–3% actual user share
  • Subtract VM/WSL inflation -> 1–2.5%
  • Adjust for survey manipulation and enthusiast bias -> ~1–2% true global user share

So, how do you explain all the rallying cries for Linux in the tech spaces?

Linux users aren't just a loud vocal minority. They also are made up of conspiracy theorists, and communists. -The kind of people that like to buck the system. (Hence the 'mom's basement dweller' stereotype. Imagine the free time a normie has to spend on a tech site vs someone who doesn't work for a living. Remove the limitations of the operating system and there's not much else to do in those basements but to spread their toxic propaganda everywhere they can.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments