this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
620 points (99.8% liked)

politics

30590 readers
2622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The fascists didn't have popular support, though. They only won because it was a coup. The US is not a democracy.

Fix the election system, and we'll get leftists in the White House.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

True. And the DSA platform includes doing away with the senate. I’d also do away with the executive and have a prime minister appointed instead by congress. One person should not have their own cabinet with complete control of the administration of bureaucratic agencies. We could all benefit from a parliamentary system, especially with representation for DC, US territories, representatives from the collective of tribal nations and Puerto Rico.

Maybe we have a shot at catching up with the rest of the world, instead of remaining in the political Stone Age.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fascists didn’t have popular support, though. They only won because it was a coup. The US is not a democracy.

Can you please clarify what you mean? While I agree with your conclusion, I don't follow your two statements leading up to it, especially the coup part. Are you talking about the last presidential election or something else?

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are multiple lawsuits alleging fraud in the 2024 election, on the part of Trump, Elon and various republican factions

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks. I'll have to read up on those allegations. The official counts appear to show that Trump received over 2 million more votes than Harris, so it seems to me any fraud to make this happen would have needed to be massive. We do have the electoral college system so I guess it's possible that smaller efforts could have flipped the result, but we barely hear anything about any of this in the media. Given that, my first instinct to the idea that Trump's win in 2024 was a coup is to think that it's a liberal version of MAGA's 2020 election fraud claims.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_lawsuits_and_litigation,_2024

There were (are) a bunch of lawsuits about it. The DOJ being firmly in the hands of the Trump administration is actually one of the reasons many of these cases aren't seeing light, not to mention all major media outlets are now owned by Trump supporters.

One I remember in particular were several counties in NY state where votes for a Dem senator were recorded, but NO votes for president were recorded. Many thousands of times.

The coup is in progress; and we won't know if it succeeds or not until November I guess

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Thanks for the link. I have no doubt that lawsuits fly with every election, especially national/presidential ones, but the main question for me would be how many more legitimate lawsuits were filed in response to 2024 compared to 2020, 2016, 2012? I have a hard time believing that there was widespread fraud and a coup this last election if nearly no one talks about it, not just in major media outlets but also non-major media, alternative media, social media. I can count on my fingers the number of times I've seen this mentioned.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Well, Trump did say that his buddy Elon is very good with computers, including voting machines, and would ensure a victory... That alone should trigger an alarm bell

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We also do need to convince normies we're right

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Normies are progressive. That's my point.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They often are right up until you tell them they're being progressive or you hit upon a topic they've been sufficiently propagandized against