this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
399 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

5921 readers
266 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The foundation behind the ultra-secure Android-based OS is speaking out after an activist was indicted for using a 'duress password' to prevent federal agents from searching his phone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 175 points 1 day ago (6 children)

So puzzled why it even needs defending in a country that is constantly screaming about free speech and rights, it is your data and no one has the right to it but you

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 113 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The US thinks it's a lot of things it isn't, and really has never been. A democracy for example.

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes unfortunately with each passing year another piece of the facade that holds this noodle house together falls and reveals it's wobbly spineless innards

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All societies are flimsy

Held up one generation at a time by the educational and cultural matrix in which the new generation form their reality

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mmm I was just talking about this, when people are so wrapped up in their own lives and don't care about each other or look out for each other, what's the point any more, society is gone. It's like people don't see it? I know it's not that bad all over but it's not a good trend and it doesn't seem to be fading

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You do realize that as recently as the 1800's the average household had at least one member infected with tapeworm at any given time?

Science and technology have brought such riches

Fuck MAGA, religion, and Trump-Orban

You do realize that as recently as the 1800’s the average household had at least one member infected with tapeworm at any given time?

Yeah, the good ol' days. Now we have to simulate having a tapeworm with Ozempic.

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We can have advanced medicine without all this bullshit surveillance machinery technology, it is possible, people just have to set aside their greed but they are not willing to

I have no idea how my lament of the lack of socialism inspired your technology rant

Building it on lies does not make it sturdier.

[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

3ish generations at a time, but ok

More accurate yes

Also we are about 3 generations from the folks who made the moon landing happen

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Im not puzzled, theyre hypocrites. They want for themselves but not for others. Its the entire core of their beliefs.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Came here to say this. It's like taking a note out of your own pocket and ripping it up. What's actually the criminal offence?

The police just want to go on a fishing expedition on your data. Just try kicking in the doors of their house to do the same thing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

That's happening.

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's definitely an unlawful search though right? I mean what crime are they looking for they can't just say they have some suspicion in order to dig through someone's personal life, that's unacceptable

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Unlawful, unfortunately no. Immoral, certainly

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately in the US, it is legal for border searches.

Thank our corrupt supreme Court

What a shame those bastards got to play dirty and get those seats and start all this garbage and they just let it happen, Citizen's United totally steamrolls all of representational democracy

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

No crossing at a boarder you have no rights. And if you're a non citizen you have even less rights.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Because there is a specific exemption for border officials in the 4th Amendment. Until he was allowed to proceed and enter the county, CBP had the full legal authority to search everything on his person and in his possession.

Edit: y'all some have to like it for it to be true.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-4/border-searches

It's a well-known exemption.

https://www.brownulr.org/blogposts/the-border-search-exception-to-the-fourth-amendment

Well-studied

https://yalelawjournal.org/essay/customs-immigration-and-rights

Legal arguments against the exemption including phone data are tenuous at best.

https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-132/the-border-search-muddle/

Y'all her your heads outta your collective butts and let's change the shit law.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, no they do not.

Constitution still applies at border crossings and without a warrant your phone isn't searchable

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

I'd love to hear what you plan on telling Cornell Law School about how wrong they are.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-4/border-searches

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but I see it as "is the data on your phone a possession?"

Hypothetically, I could have my phone geofenced so that when I was within a certain distage of a border, it would wipe part or all of my data, and then automatically restore my data when I get a certain distance from the border. Is it illegal to wipe my data? Definitely not. Can I be compelled to download data to my phone? Definitely not. Can I be prosecuted for things on my phone that I was compelled to download to my phone? Also definitely not.

So border patrol can search the phone without a warrant, but can they compell you to give up your cloud account passwords and 2FAs? What about your Bank account credentials? What if you genuinely can't remember them in that instance?

Can they even prove that the phone was wiped in response to CBP trying to access it with a duress password? Is it illegal now to bring a wiped phone over the border?

So many questions!

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 17 hours ago

Did you even read the article in the last link? This is well-worn territory.

Questions? Have you read anything about this case? The guy told the officer what happened. Told him! Hadn't even been Mirandized FFS! And volunteers that the officer entered the code to wipe the phone.

It's SO boneheaded.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -5 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Because it was an active search and he destroyed the "evidence". Well be interesting how this plays out I can see both sides.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago

It was not an an active search. The phone was seized illegally.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 3 points 21 hours ago

A warrant is required to search personal belongings. This was a patdown, no different from a security guard checking your ID.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago

It's fully legal to have a wipe set on your device

Its spelled 'freeze peach' and its delicious. Common misconception.