129

Since there has not yet been an official announcement regarding this matter, I wanted to provide some clarity to the community.

Last week, it was discovered that the Tesseract frontend included an undisclosed and unsanctioned blocklist that prevented users from seeing certain people and communities across the fedivese. This led to significant controversy across the Fediverse, after which the original developer withdrew the project and left the Fediverse.

Everyone is entitled to their own views and to make their own choices about the content they wish to see. However, when those choices are built into an open-source project, they must be disclosed publicly and presented transparently to users. Quietly imposing a blocklist without their knowledge is a serious breach of trust and, in my view, raises legitimate concerns about the security and integrity of the software.

As a result, we have disabled the Tesseract frontend on sh.itjust.works indefinitely.

We are open to offering other alternative frontends. If there is one you would like us to consider, please share your suggestion in !main@sh.itjust.works or !agora@sh.itjust.works.

Thank you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheUnsungRooster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Despite a lot of trolls saying I'm this dev due to aligning with him on certain beliefs (like not being okay with threatening or encouraging violence towards others based on politics). What he did is wrong and brings up severe concern relating to the security and integrity of the software. I never used it but if I did I would change my passwords immediately.

[-] Eldritch@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's the social doctrine of tolerance. It only applies to those who practice it. Likewise those that support politics of violence aren't deserving of peace. That's not to say that some don't get too far out over their skis or are far too enthusiastic with labels and attacks. But the answer isn't to force their silence, proving them right. It's to prove them wrong your own actions. Which is where ptz/patric rightfully failed badly. There is no defense of them.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Even if you are him, there's a limit to what is and isn't acceptable. Or, more honestly, if someone is going to go full on war about it, they also merit censure for their choices.

I'm actually all for political violence as a form of change. It isn't my first choice, and it shouldn't be anyone's first choice. But it has its place in the toolbox of revolution. Nazis need punching, and whatnot.

But being an asshole online isn't that. If some asshat does what patrick did, they absolutely deserve to be run off of the platform, and never allowed back. Once we stoop to shitty harassment and empty threats when there's a dozen paths to try first, well, we're asshats too.

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Its funny you open with not being that patrick. I mean i mentioned my confusion that oh am i actually talking shit to his alt and had my comment deleted in another post. Which reinforced the idea this is his alt. And now i come across this. Like dude its kinda sad. Being a mod must suck, you get a lil power over a forum so then you go crazy like you actually mean something. But then go cry when given pushback when you do stupid shit.

[-] pinto@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

You aren't subtle.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
129 points (99.2% liked)

Announcements

159 readers
1 users here now

SJW discussion community: !main@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS