129

Since there has not yet been an official announcement regarding this matter, I wanted to provide some clarity to the community.

Last week, it was discovered that the Tesseract frontend included an undisclosed and unsanctioned blocklist that prevented users from seeing certain people and communities across the fedivese. This led to significant controversy across the Fediverse, after which the original developer withdrew the project and left the Fediverse.

Everyone is entitled to their own views and to make their own choices about the content they wish to see. However, when those choices are built into an open-source project, they must be disclosed publicly and presented transparently to users. Quietly imposing a blocklist without their knowledge is a serious breach of trust and, in my view, raises legitimate concerns about the security and integrity of the software.

As a result, we have disabled the Tesseract frontend on sh.itjust.works indefinitely.

We are open to offering other alternative frontends. If there is one you would like us to consider, please share your suggestion in !main@sh.itjust.works or !agora@sh.itjust.works.

Thank you

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Eldritch@piefed.social 26 points 2 months ago

This is the way.

[-] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

Looks like Tesseract is being scrubbed as well - their Github repo is removed, as is their .world community.

I appreciate your choice - cutting it will help convince users to abandon it and is much better than allowing it to continue, imo

[-] TheMadIrishman@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Expertly said and handled, as usual. Thanks Dude.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Thank you kindly, Dude. We appreciate you.

[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Agree with the post, just curious if anyone knows or can estimate how many users were on tesseract? Just i never heard of it before the controversy and interested in why the news spread so quickly about it.

[-] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago

The felony probably helped propel the story along. Everyone loves a good drama that ends in a credible risk of jail time for the least sufferable person involved.

[-] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 2 months ago
[-] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 15 points 2 months ago

Right before the final ragequit dude added code to cause all users to DDoS the db0 instance.

If caught, dude could face felony charges as intentional DDoS attacks are, in fact, very illegal.

[-] kibblebits@quokk.au 2 points 2 months ago

Interesting. Db0 would have to file charges. And I doubt they would. But that’s a pretty interesting predicament they got themselves into.

[-] TheUnsungRooster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Despite a lot of trolls saying I'm this dev due to aligning with him on certain beliefs (like not being okay with threatening or encouraging violence towards others based on politics). What he did is wrong and brings up severe concern relating to the security and integrity of the software. I never used it but if I did I would change my passwords immediately.

[-] Eldritch@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's the social doctrine of tolerance. It only applies to those who practice it. Likewise those that support politics of violence aren't deserving of peace. That's not to say that some don't get too far out over their skis or are far too enthusiastic with labels and attacks. But the answer isn't to force their silence, proving them right. It's to prove them wrong your own actions. Which is where ptz/patric rightfully failed badly. There is no defense of them.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Even if you are him, there's a limit to what is and isn't acceptable. Or, more honestly, if someone is going to go full on war about it, they also merit censure for their choices.

I'm actually all for political violence as a form of change. It isn't my first choice, and it shouldn't be anyone's first choice. But it has its place in the toolbox of revolution. Nazis need punching, and whatnot.

But being an asshole online isn't that. If some asshat does what patrick did, they absolutely deserve to be run off of the platform, and never allowed back. Once we stoop to shitty harassment and empty threats when there's a dozen paths to try first, well, we're asshats too.

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Its funny you open with not being that patrick. I mean i mentioned my confusion that oh am i actually talking shit to his alt and had my comment deleted in another post. Which reinforced the idea this is his alt. And now i come across this. Like dude its kinda sad. Being a mod must suck, you get a lil power over a forum so then you go crazy like you actually mean something. But then go cry when given pushback when you do stupid shit.

[-] pinto@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

You aren't subtle.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
129 points (99.2% liked)

Announcements

159 readers
1 users here now

SJW discussion community: !main@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS