this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
93 points (94.3% liked)

History Memes

2900 readers
791 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

  6. Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Elting@piefed.social 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Sahara used to be far greener in the not too distant past I thought? Also the taiga will be very far less green very soon.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The area around a major river being greener helps in no way the emergence of a river civilization.

What matters is that the river banks are fertile, the area has a good climate (especially a long growing season), domesticates were brought, and the area around is worse for sustenance.

Much to the contrary, the area around being better for sustenance probably makes it more difficult and unlikely for a civilization to emerge, as it allows people to freely escape taxation / corvée by just migrating away from such attempts.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That area has supported hominids since way before civilization. Its crazy how many "cousins" we used to have. It seems like biodiversity used to be way higher there.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This has no relation to the emergence of civilization.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah but it does explain why humans were able to evolve in that area, and then eventually adapted to its changes better than the branches that didn't make it.