this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
440 points (99.8% liked)

World News

57306 readers
1416 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ding ding ding.

I'm lost on how so many people seemed to take me listing the countries I did followed by the description of them as having "run on compassion for others and doing the right thing for the last hundred plus years" and seen anything other than sarcasm.

All of the listed countries have been responsible for the deaths of mass numbers of innocent civilians, and kids, and nuns, and nuns carrying infants who were carrying baby kittens over the last 100 or so years. Fuck, more than one of them has been responsible for that in the last few months.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I covered a few bases and was very wordy in my other comment to you, but otherwise yeah that really did not land for the majority. FWIW sarcasm was my first take.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Nice. To be fair I was super high yesterday and couldn't stop typing. Switched ADD meds yesterday morning and am now trying to adjust to a larger amount of a different form of amphetamine. Not an awful problem to have, but understandably likely confusing to try to translate from the outside.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Aha I also was commenting way too much last night. Hope the meds go well - my healthcare provider often mandates a gradual switch of taking both together, and increasing one while decreasing the other, mainly to mitigate adverse effects. If you switched suddenly that would be hella rough.

You don't need to justify anything, and thanks for sharing 🙃

[–] Rawrosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

In my case it was a combination of it being hard to read sarcasm online in many cases, especially if you are not already familiar with the author, along with the number of times I run into "You don't support A? That means you support B!" in political discussions.