this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
996 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86745 readers
2489 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Human eyes are also sensitive to high intensity IR and UV light so you will also blind a human wearing them. Depending on the wavelength, permanently.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 hours ago

So what? They were okay with wearing glasses anyway.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'm already in favor of using high-powered lasers, you don't have to keep convincing me

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I meant to include ‘strobe’ in the definition. A low duty cycle would cut down on the biological impact, and rapid, random cycling would help blind the sensors as they try to compensate.

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Lidar would probably do the trick