this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
187 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

4946 readers
127 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Bullllllllshit.

They've said that for years. It's easy to do. But they won't do it

[–] XLE@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How's it easy?

Not the technical part (which definitely looks as easy as just dropping a requirement), but the spam/abuse prevention part.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond.

Anyway, it's not an issue on Wire or SimpleX or the dozens of other platforms that don't require phone numbers. It's obviously a solved problem. Signal is just making up fake excuses.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s pretty easy to detect spam. I guess user reports and noticing when someone suddenly messages many new users and those users do not respond.

It's not so easy, because you could even register a new account for each new spam message, or register 100k accounts & only send out 3 messages a day / account..

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 16 hours ago

Obviously not. Because this isn't an issue elsewhere

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's pretty easy to detect spam.

Tell that to... any social media. Lol. If was easy to detect bot you think they not big problem anymore.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 1 day ago

Social media is different from a platform that's literally just DMs.

[–] arin@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -3 points 2 days ago

So, no asynchronous messaging? Kinda kills it.