this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
33 points (70.4% liked)

PC Master Race

22210 readers
413 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm pretty sure that they're talking about people deploying hundreds of VMs in a single go... In which case, licensing fees start racking up; and certain kinds of linux are very good at that kind of deployment.

once you start walking away from end-user computing; as an example, MS holds only 8% of all web-facing servers, where Unix (including linux,) is 90%. Linux distros specifically, are something like 61%. Nobody has even mentions apple's macOS server options. Roughly half of professional devs use windows as the daily driver; but that largely has to do with organizations and integration with other MS products (like office.)

IMO, more telling in this conversation is the supercomputers... which are entirely some form of linux. And also, MS's own Azure, clients mostly use linux. And for good reason kubernettes and docker were designed for linux, and it's just easier. Also, there's no per-instance license fees for your VM's if you're using linux. there is for microslop.