this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
1206 points (99.4% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2844 readers
540 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

Please respect Lemmy.world ToS. Don't plot who should be murdered next in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

drug dogs are not actually accurate at finding drugs, they sound off when their handler indicates. do with that what you will.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fun fact, if you're white, you can easily smuggle things by just not watching the search.

The cop is watching you to know when to signal the dog to alert.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

They either watch you to know when to signal, in the cases where it actually "works" (which, as fucked up as it is, reading your body language is "working" for some definition of working), or they're just using it as an excuse to search/harass you, in which case they just signal when they want to.

And this frame up/parallel construction was so inept it makes me believe for a split second they are not adequately competenr manage to send those signals.

[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you back this up or is it just a trust me bro?

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://www.bjjohnsonlaw.com/probable-cause-or-probable-fiction-the-legal-myth-of-the-drug-sniffing-dog

A 2011 analysis by the Chicago Tribune examined three years of data on police dog alerts during traffic stops in suburban Chicago. The study found that drugs or paraphernalia were discovered in only 44% of cases where dogs alerted. Notably, the accuracy dropped to 27% when the driver was Latino, suggesting potential bias in the deployment or interpretation of canine alerts.

[–] fosho@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This doesn't prove dogs can't detect odors. At best it implies bias in officers which is not really what you suggested. It's also a lone study.

I work adjacent to this field so these kinds of claims coming from someone who clearly doesn't makes it sound like you don't really know what you are talking about.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Look man, I was just linking you to a study when you asked for sources. There’s no need for hostility here. Also, there are more studies discussed in the article if you actually click on the link.