6

Just a bit of an open discussion really...

I did my CEH a few years ago and luckily work paid for it - if it was my own money, I'd be asking for a refund.

The course content included stuff from ~10 years earlier, inc. referring to tools that hadn't been maintained (ie in github) for years and basically didn't work any more... and topics like warchalking.. ok, it's interesting to know the history, but as the Wikipedia article mentions, I don't think it really took off and no-one uses it anymore.

So, I let my certification slide and the EC Council have been continually trying to "remind" me to pay for my membership.

I just don't have the feeling that they're really trying to keep up and improve the industry.

I'm now managing a team of Cyber Security Engineers and this came up as a training topic recently, so I'm looking for others to help me reset my bias.

So... did you have the opposite experience?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It isnt respected in the hacker community but it is in the HR community for job postings. Sec+ has better content and is a fraction of the cost. And if you want to prove hands-on skills, OSCP is nearly the same price and well respected by everyone.

In my opinion, CEH has done a tremendous job at branding. Non-cyber tech people all know it. But the content is beginner level stuff.

[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

Good point on the branding, I think most of the fees are.going to the marketing dept. not the course content dept.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
6 points (87.5% liked)

cybersecurity

6456 readers
63 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

Enjoy!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS