97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He didn't make any mistakes. What he predicted came true and he always gave his opinion on the best evidence at the time.

I cannot believe people are pushing this bullshit if we didn't live through all of this just a few years ago.

Fauci was saving lives, while Trump, Rogan and the rest of the right wing grifters were telling people to inject bleach into their assholes....

https://youtu.be/wWxqBaWt5uY

[-] kljafgg9r0@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

He lied about wearing masks and told people not to wear them, directly leading to thousands of more deaths and cases. What are you smoking?

[-] pastaq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Lied is doing a lot of dishonest work here.

  • There were mask shortages and they wanted to ensure the front line medical staff around the country had masks first
  • When he said that we didn't yet know about asymptomatic transmission.
  • There wasn't any data yet on how the virus spread.
  • There wasn't data on if homemade cloth masks would be effective.
  • He reversed this stance a month later when the data supported the guidance.

This is the kind of bullshit peddling that causes people to mistrust science. He made a decision based on the best evidence at the time, and then continued to update that stance as new information came in. What you're doing is exactly the kind of post-mortum FUD that the person you replied to was talking about.

[-] kljafgg9r0@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

There were mask shortages and they wanted to ensure the front line medical staff around the country had masks first

Okay, so you already admit he HE LIED. And it's a ridiculous reason anyway, hospitals don't get masks at the grocery store, they have their own suppliers. He could have even told people to wear cloth masks!

Japan and a bunch of other countries were already masking up. It's so basic anyone who graduated high school biology could tell you this was an airborn disease and that masks would help.

He reversed this stance a month later when the data supported the guidance.

No he didn't, there was no 'data' to support the guidance. China, SK, and Japan and more were already masking up.

Your first sentence also contradicts this-you said "There were mask shortages and they wanted to ensure the front line medical staff around the country had masks first" There it is, he knew masks were working, and he told people not to wear masks. Not because of 'new data' but because he wanted to prevent mask shortages, which didn't work anyway and helped the disease rapidly spread because people were told not to mask.

God you people are so pathetic defending this misinformation that literally killed thousands of people.

[-] pastaq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Okay, so you already admit he HE LIED. And it's a ridiculous reason anyway, hospitals don't get masks at the grocery store, they have their own suppliers. He could have even told people to wear cloth masks!

There absolutely were mask shortages. Full stop. You are the one lying.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7129293/ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/04/why-were-running-out-of-masks-in-the-coronavirus-crisis/609757/

They then told people to make masks at home and leave the N95 for healthcare workers.

https://www.healthline.com/health/how-to-make-a-mask-out-of-fabric

https://twin-cities.umn.edu/news-events/diy-face-masks-during-covid-19

Your first sentence also contradicts this-you said "There were mask shortages and they wanted to ensure the front line medical staff around the country had masks first" There it is, he knew masks were working, and he told people not to wear masks. Not because of 'new data' but because he wanted to prevent mask shortages, which didn't work anyway and helped the disease rapidly spread because people were told not to mask.

Convenient of you to leave out the part about ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION that I mentioned, which they didn't know yet. Masks for symptomatic people and people caring for the sick were always recommended.

https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2021-07-27/timeline-cdc-mask-guidance-during-covid-19-pandemic

All of these articles were posted during COVID. You're full of shit. Stop spreading lies.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
97 points (85.4% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1859 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS