this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
42 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
5877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
42
Humanising LLM Outputs is Dumb (kuber.studio)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

This article is what's dumb:

The durable version is agents whose native language is precise, machine-facing state, with the warm, concise, human version generated only at the boundary.

Cool bro, we'll take the natural lagauage machine, somehow make it generate machine language instead, and then magically convert "machine facts" into "human interpretation" only at the "rendering boundary" which is always very clearly defined, as this article points out when it mentions how sometimes humans read LLM output and sometimes they pipe it directly to other LLMs.

There is no formula that generates only true statements.